Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Advancing sustainability in low-resource settings: development and validation of a sustainability tool for evidence-based interventions and programs

Title: Advancing sustainability in low-resource settings: development and validation of a sustainability tool for evidence-based interventions and programs
Authors: Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom; Subramaniam, Divya S.; Nwaozuru, Ucheoma; Gbaja-biamila, Titilola; Blessing, Lateef Akeem; Shato, Thembekile; Oladele, David; Hirschhorn, Lisa R.; Shacham, Enbal; Xian, Hong; Ezechi, Oliver Chukwujekwu; Iwelunmor, Juliet
Source: Frontiers in Health Services ; volume 5 ; ISSN 2813-0146
Publisher Information: Frontiers Media SA
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Frontiers (Publisher - via CrossRef)
Description: Introduction Despite substantial research and growing evidence on effectiveness, the longer-term benefits of proven healthcare interventions and programs have not been fully explored due to challenges sustaining such efforts. Existing sustainability measures developed in high-income countries may not reflect determinants unique to the sustainability of interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including African countries. To address this gap, our study developed a Sustainability Tool to Assess Evidence-Based Interventions and Programs (STEPS), which provides a theory-based measure that can be used to assess multilevel determinants of sustainability from the perspective of frontline health workers, service providers, or implementation practitioners. Methods STEPS domains and the initial scale item pool were generated based on a review of existing literature on sustainability in the African region. Two rounds of expert reviews were conducted with 12 experts from nine African countries, providing ratings and feedback on the relevancy of each item. Then, face validity was conducted among ten healthcare workers involved in implementing interventions and programs in Nigeria. Content validity metrics and consensus methods were used to remove redundancy, reducing the final scale to 31 items. Subsequently, we piloted STEPS among 256 healthcare workers in Nigeria directly involved in implementing evidence-based programs and/or interventions. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify the underlying factor structure, followed by reliability analysis. Results The EFA indicated that a four-factor 31-item structure best fits the data (Kaiser Criterion of eigenvalues >1, confirmed by scree plot, and interpretability). The four subscales are: (1) intervention characteristics (2) organizational capacity, (3) implementation context and values, and 4) socio-cultural and community context. The Cronbach's alpha for the subscales ranged from 0.83 to 0.95. Overall, STEPS demonstrated ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: unknown
DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1618400
DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1618400/full
Availability: https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1618400; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2025.1618400/full
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.FAB5AE43
Database: BASE