Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Development of quality indicators for antimicrobial treatment in adults with sepsis

Title: Development of quality indicators for antimicrobial treatment in adults with sepsis
Authors: van den Bosch, CMA; Hulscher, MEJL; Natsch, S; Gyssens, IC; Prins, JM; Geerlings, SE; Bax, Hannelore
Source: van den Bosch, CMA, Hulscher, MEJL, Natsch, S, Gyssens, IC, Prins, JM, Geerlings, SE, Dutch Sepsis QI expert panel & Bax, H 2014, 'Development of quality indicators for antimicrobial treatment in adults with sepsis', BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, 345. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-345
Publication Year: 2014
Subject Terms: /dk/atira/pure/keywords/researchprograms/AFL001000/EMCMM042804; name=EMC MM-04-28-04
Description: BACKGROUND: Outcomes in patients with sepsis are better if initial empirical antimicrobial use is appropriate. Several studies have shown that adherence to guidelines dictating appropriate antimicrobial use positively influences clinical outcome, shortens length of hospital stay and contributes to the containment of antibiotic resistance.Quality indicators (QIs) can be systematically developed from these guidelines to define and measure appropriate antimicrobial use. We describe the development of a concise set of QIs to assess the appropriateness of antimicrobial use in adult patients with sepsis on a general medical ward or Intensive Care Unit (ICU). METHODS: A RAND-modified, five step Delphi procedure was used. A multidisciplinary panel of 14 experts appraised and prioritized 40 key recommendations from within the Dutch national guideline on antimicrobial use for adult hospitalized patients with sepsis (http://www.swab.nl/guidelines). A procedure to select QIs relevant to clinical outcome, antimicrobial resistance and costs was performed using two rounds of questionnaires with a face-to-face consensus meeting between the rounds over a period of three months. RESULTS: The procedure resulted in the selection of a final set of five QIs, namely: obtain cultures; prescribe empirical antimicrobial therapy according to the national guideline; start intravenous drug therapy; start antimicrobial treatment within one hour; and streamline antimicrobial therapy. CONCLUSION: This systematic, stepwise method, which combined evidence and expert opinion, led to a concise and therefore feasible set of QIs for optimal antimicrobial use in hospitalized adult patients with sepsis. The next step will entail subjecting these quality indicators to an applicability test for their clinimetric properties and ultimately, using these QIs in quality-improvement projects. This information is crucial for antimicrobial stewardship teams to help set priorities and to focus improvement.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 1471-2334
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/24950718; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1471-2334; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1471-2334
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-345
Availability: https://pure.eur.nl/en/publications/e3d79f08-b2ed-4039-a5c0-8be1df230871; https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-345; https://pure.eur.nl/ws/files/56169058/Development_of_quality_indicators_for_antimicrobial_treatment_in_adults_with_sepsis.pdf
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.FE40AE84
Database: BASE