| Title: |
Public engagement with genomics |
| Authors: |
Middleton, Anna; Adams, Avery; Aidid, Hugbaad; Atutornu, Jerome; Boraschi, Daniela; Borra, Julian; Bircan, Tuba; Burch, Claudette; Costa, Alessia; Dickinson, Anna; Enticknap, Ann; Galloway, Catherine; Gale, Francesca; Garlick, Emma; Haydon, Em; Henriques, Sasha; Mitchell, Marion; Milne, Richard; Monaghan, Jack; Morley, Katherine; Muella Santos, Milena; Olivares Boldu, Laura; Olumogba, Fifi; Orviss, Kate; Parry, Vivienne; Patch, Christine; Robarts, Lauren; Shingles, Sam; Smidt, Cindy; Tomlin, Ben; Parkinson, Sarah |
| Publisher Information: |
Wellcome; Faculty of Education; //doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19473.2 |
| Publication Year: |
2023 |
| Collection: |
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository |
| Subject Terms: |
32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences; 42 Health Sciences; Genetics; Human Genome; Generic health relevance |
| Description: |
As detailed in its flagship report, Genome UK, the UK government recognises the vital role that broad public engagement across whole populations plays in the field of genomics. However, there is limited evidence about how to do this at scale, particularly for public audiences who are not especially interested in the science, are unsure of the relevance to their lives or who feel disengaged from it. We use a narrative review to explore: (i) UK attitudes towards genetics and genomics and what may influence reluctance to engage with these topics; (ii) innovative public engagement approaches that have been used to bring diverse public audiences into conversations about the technology. Whilst we have found some novel engagement methods that have used participatory arts, film, social media and deliberative methods, there is no clear agreement on best practice. We did not find a consistently used, evidence-based strategy for delivering public engagement about genomics across diverse and broad populations, nor a specific method that is known to encourage engagement from groups that have historically felt (in terms of perception) and been (in reality) excluded from genomic research. We argue there is a need for well-defined, tailor-made engagement strategies that clearly articulate the audience, the purpose and the proposed impact of the engagement intervention. This needs to be coupled with robust evaluation frameworks to build the evidence-base for population-level engagement strategies. |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| File Description: |
application/pdf |
| Language: |
English |
| Relation: |
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/383004 |
| Availability: |
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/383004 |
| Rights: |
Attribution 4.0 International ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.FE91995F |
| Database: |
BASE |