Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Culturally Relevant Pedagogy in Practice: A Case Study of a Teacher's Divergence From Large‐Scale Science Curriculum

Title: Culturally Relevant Pedagogy in Practice: A Case Study of a Teacher's Divergence From Large‐Scale Science Curriculum
Authors: Miller, Emily Adah; Reigh, Emily V.; Mathis, Clausell
Source: Journal of Research in Science Teaching ; ISSN 0022-4308 1098-2736
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP) is an approach to teaching that challenges the inequitable structures that create an education debt for minoritized students. Many studies of CRP in science education focus on teachers' philosophies and dispositions; fewer studies have focused on enacted teaching practice, such as the use of curricular resources. CRP requires that teachers take an oppositional stance toward curricula and actively reconstruct them to center the cultures of their students. In this study, we use ethnographic methods informed by Ladson‐Billings' original work to investigate one teacher's implementation of a large‐scale science curriculum in a Spanish‐English dual‐language immersion class that serves Latine students. We illustrate the teacher's enactment of the conceptions of CRP, showing how she drew from the curricular resources and also diverged from them at different grain sizes, including (a) in‐the‐moment divergence from prescribed teacher moves, (b) lesson‐level divergence from curricular activities, and (c) unit‐level divergence from curricular goals. These divergences reveal how the teacher translated her culturally relevant philosophies into unique classroom practices that she coconstructed with her students. In contrast to other approaches in science education that position curriculum as authoritative and ask teachers to implement it, often with fidelity, we instead argue that teachers should be supported to take a critical stance toward curriculum and diverge from it in ways that reflect their justice‐oriented philosophies, like CRP.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/tea.70017
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70017; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/tea.70017
Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.FFC5698E
Database: BASE