Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Directory of Open Access Journals kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

'Don’t You Love Me?' Abusers’ use of shame-to-guilt to coercively control 2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals and rural women experiencing intimate partner violence

Title: 'Don’t You Love Me?' Abusers’ use of shame-to-guilt to coercively control 2SLGBTQQIA+ individuals and rural women experiencing intimate partner violence
Authors: Stefan Kurbatfinski; Nicole Letourneau; Jason Novick; Susanne Marshall; Keira Griggs; Dawn McBride; Kendra Nixon
Source: Women's Health, Vol 21 (2025)
Publisher Information: SAGE Publishing, 2025.
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: LCC:Medicine
Subject Terms: Medicine
Description: Background: Abusers’ use of manipulative behaviors to trigger feelings of shame-to-guilt (a process through which abusers shame their partners to incur feelings of guilt) among their 2SLGBTQQIA+ and rural women intimate partners is a type of emotional abuse used to coercively control their partners. Objective: This study investigated the different tactics that abusers use to shame-to-guilt their partners who identify as 2SLGBTQQIA+ and/or reside in rural areas. Design: A qualitative design was used to conduct this study. Methods: We used data from two larger studies to undertake thematic analysis using semi-structured interviews with Albertan 2SLGBTQQ+ ( n = 18; no participants identified as intersex or asexual) and rural women ( n = 11) who experienced shame-to-guilt behaviors along with service providers who worked with these groups ( n = 24). Results: Seven themes were identified based on participants’ experiences, including shaming identity in relation to gender and sexual orientation (manifesting differentially between 2SLGBTQQ+ and rural women participants), emotional and sexual manipulation, threats of death by suicide (predominating among 2SLGBTQQ+ individuals), apologies and vacuous promises as components of the cycle of abuse, using one’s parenting and children’s well-being to manipulate partners, the use of health conditions and faking illness, and the use of religion or faith to reinforce gender standards. Conclusion: For 2SLGBTQQIA+ and rural women groups, situating shame-to-guilt behaviors within the cycle of abuse is important information that has not been explored extensively in the intimate partner violence literature. For individuals self-identifying as 2SLGBTQQIA+ or women living rurally, the means through which they are shamed-to-guilt intersects with their unique identities and positionality. Therefore, recommendations are presented to help these groups rebuild their identities when shame-to-guilt behaviors were experienced as part of the abusive dynamic.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1745-5065
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1745-5065
DOI: 10.1177/17455057251335361
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/dc2e73d228524c0ea0ce7e1ffa7cfd67
Accession Number: edsdoj.2e73d228524c0ea0ce7e1ffa7cfd67
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals