Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Directory of Open Access Journals kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Machine learning in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of predictive analytics applications

Title: Machine learning in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of predictive analytics applications
Authors: Tim Schneller; Moritz Kraus; Jan Schätz; Philipp Moroder; Markus Scheibel; Asimina Lazaridou
Source: Bone & Joint Open, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 126-134 (2025)
Publisher Information: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2025.
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: LCC:Orthopedic surgery
Subject Terms: machine learning; systematic review; total shoulder arthroplasty; clinical outcomes; image analysis; predictive analytics; shoulder arthroplasty; rtsa; shoulder surgeries; imaging studies; clinicians; shoulder prosthesis; orthopaedic surgery; augmentation; Orthopedic surgery; RD701-811
Description: Aims: Machine learning (ML) holds significant promise in optimizing various aspects of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), potentially improving patient outcomes and enhancing surgical decision-making. The aim of this systematic review was to identify ML algorithms and evaluate their effectiveness, including those for predicting clinical outcomes and those used in image analysis. Methods: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies applying ML algorithms in TSA. The analysis focused on dataset characteristics, relevant subspecialties, specific ML algorithms used, and their performance outcomes. Results: Following the final screening process, 25 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria for our review. Of these, 60% focused on tabular data while the remaining 40% analyzed image data. Among them, 16 studies were dedicated to developing new models and nine used transfer learning to leverage existing pretrained models. Additionally, three of these models underwent external validation to confirm their reliability and effectiveness. Conclusion: ML algorithms used in TSA demonstrated fair to good performance, as evidenced by the reported metrics. Integrating these models into daily clinical practice could revolutionize TSA, enhancing both surgical precision and patient outcome predictions. Despite their potential, the lack of transparency and generalizability in many current models poses a significant challenge, limiting their clinical utility. Future research should prioritize addressing these limitations to truly propel the field forward and maximize the benefits of ML in enhancing patient care. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(2):126–134.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2633-1462
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0234.R1
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/2ff0924aa73f4dae829bebbb2d31e87d
Accession Number: edsdoj.2ff0924aa73f4dae829bebbb2d31e87d
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals