Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Directory of Open Access Journals kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Prostate volume: does it predict patient outcomes following prostate artery embolisation? A retrospective cohort study

Title: Prostate volume: does it predict patient outcomes following prostate artery embolisation? A retrospective cohort study
Authors: Robert Wise; Howell Fu; Charles Ross Tapping
Source: CVIR Endovascular, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2024)
Publisher Information: SpringerOpen, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
Subject Terms: Prostate artery embolisation; Prostate size; Prostate volume; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system; RC666-701
Description: Abstract Prostate artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive procedure commonly performed to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated patient questionnaire quantifying LUTS and is used for patient selection for PAE, but it is largely subjective. Prostate volume is an easily estimated objective parameter across multiple imaging modalities. No strict threshold of prostate volume is established as a selection criterion for PAE, but it is generally accepted that prostate volume should be over 40 to 50 mL. We looked at a sample of 65 cases performed at a large teaching hospital between 2017 and 2019 with a minimum of four years follow up. Embospheres between 100 to 500 microns were injected into the prostatic arteries bilaterally (if technically feasible). A ‘bullet shape’ model was used to estimate prostatic volume from initial CT. N = 13 had an estimated volume 5). 23% of patients required further PAE procedure or surgery. No major complications were recorded. The mean change in IPSS under 51 mL compared to over 51 mL cohort was 10.2 versus 11 (standard deviation 7.5 versus 7.3) (p = 0.44, 2 tailed Student’s T-test). There was no statistically significant difference in the IPSS improvement or outcome of small volume prostates under 51 mL compared to large volume. Our results suggest that prostate volume should not be used to exclude patients for PAE.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2520-8934
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2520-8934
DOI: 10.1186/s42155-024-00464-4
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/3a3cd971926d4d8ea4e943f5a08d15ee
Accession Number: edsdoj.3a3cd971926d4d8ea4e943f5a08d15ee
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals