Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Directory of Open Access Journals kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Learning needs and perceived barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care: a survey of front-line nurses on acute medical wards

Title: Learning needs and perceived barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care: a survey of front-line nurses on acute medical wards
Authors: Julie C Reid; Jill C Rudkowski; Deborah J Cook; Neala Hoad; Anne Boyle; Daniel Brandt Vegas; Kathleen Willison; Rajendar Hanmiah; Mino Mitri; Amanda Weatherston; Susan Lohin; Deborah McInnes; Michelle Joyner
Source: BMJ Open Quality, Vol 12, Iss 2 (2023)
Publisher Information: BMJ Publishing Group, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Medicine (General)
Subject Terms: Medicine (General); R5-920
Description: Objectives Caring for dying hospitalised patients is a healthcare priority. Our objective was to understand the learning needs of front-line nurses on the general internal medicine (GIM) hospital wards, and perceived barriers to, and facilitators of, optimal end-of-life care.Methods We developed an 85-item survey informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability–Opportunity–Motivation–Behaviour system. We included demographics and two main domains (knowledge and practice; delivering end-of-life care) with seven subsections. Nurses from four GIM wards and the nursing resource team completed this survey. We analysed and compared results overall, by Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation, and by survey domain. We considered items with median scores 5 years).Results Our response rate was 60.5% (144/238). 51% had been practising for >5 years; most respondents were female (93.1%). Nurses had similar scores on the knowledge (mean 76.0%; SD 11.6%) and delivering care (mean 74.5% (8.6%)) domains. Scores for items associated with Capability were higher than those associated with Opportunity (median (first, third quartiles) 78.6% (67.9%, 87.5%) vs 73.9% (66.0%, 81.8%); p=0.04). Nurses practising >5 years had significantly higher scores on all analyses. Barriers included engaging with families having strong emotional reactions, managing goals of care conflicts between patients and families, and staffing challenges on the ward. Additional requested resources included formal training, information binders and more staff. Opportunities for consideration include formalised on-the-job training, access to comprehensive information, including symptom management at the end of life, and debriefing sessions.Conclusions Front-line nurses reported an interest in learning more about end-of-life care and identified important barriers that are feasible to address. These results will inform specific knowledge translation strategies to build capacity among bedside nurses to enhance end-of-life care practices for dying patients on GIM wards.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2399-6641
Relation: https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/2/e002219.full; https://doaj.org/toc/2399-6641
DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002219
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/4e0019fbdca6450bac6eebeb5e7e95a7
Accession Number: edsdoj.4e0019fbdca6450bac6eebeb5e7e95a7
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals