Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Directory of Open Access Journals kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line IV vs oral iron for iron-deficiency anemia in women with heavy menstrual bleeding

Title: Cost-effectiveness of first-line IV vs oral iron for iron-deficiency anemia in women with heavy menstrual bleeding
Authors: Daniel Wang; Manraj Sra; Satoko Ito; Ding Quan Ng; Samira Glaeser-Khan; Daniel Y. Wang; Sam Hirniak; Alfred Ian Lee; Adam Cuker; George Goshua
Source: Blood Advances, Vol 10, Iss 5, Pp 1508-1517 (2026)
Publisher Information: Elsevier, 2026.
Publication Year: 2026
Collection: LCC:Specialties of internal medicine
Subject Terms: Specialties of internal medicine; RC581-951
Description: Abstract: Iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) affects nearly one-third of women globally, with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) being a significant risk factor among those of reproductive age. Despite the substantial burden of HMB-related IDA, patients often face delays in receiving effective treatment. Oral iron is typically used as first-line therapy, despite frequent gastrointestinal side effects and challenges in treatment adherence. This study evaluated the reproductive life span cost-effectiveness of first-line intravenous (IV) vs oral iron therapy for women with HMB and IDA. We developed a Markov model simulating a cohort of women aged 18 to 51 years, comparing first-line treatment with IV iron dextran, IV ferumoxytol, IV iron sucrose, or oral ferrous sulfate. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated from the societal perspective. IV iron dextran was the cost-effective treatment, yielding 19.26 QALYs at a cost of $157 500, compared with 19.10 QALYs at $152 900 for oral ferrous sulfate. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for IV iron dextran was $28 600 per QALY. Treatment with IV ferumoxytol and iron sucrose cost $158 300 and $163 500, respectively, and did not provide additional QALY benefit compared with IV iron dextran, which remained the cost-effective treatment across a range of scenarios and sensitivity analyses. Our findings indicate that first-line treatment with IV iron dextran is the cost-effective strategy for managing IDA in women with HMB at commonly accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds. These results support expanding access to IV iron as a first-line option, and highlight the need to reduce treatment delays and insurance-related barriers.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2473-9529
Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S247395292600011X; https://doaj.org/toc/2473-9529
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018315
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/b8ffbf6ccdf74c49b025ddc77b17ff3d
Accession Number: edsdoj.b8ffbf6ccdf74c49b025ddc77b17ff3d
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals