Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Directory of Open Access Journals kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Phytogenic and prebiotic feed additives as antibiotic substitutes: effects on broiler meat quality, organ properties, and production efficiency when fed standard and reduced energy and protein diets

Title: Phytogenic and prebiotic feed additives as antibiotic substitutes: effects on broiler meat quality, organ properties, and production efficiency when fed standard and reduced energy and protein diets
Authors: Maged A. Al-Garadi; Rashed A. Alhotan; Elsayed O. Hussein; Mohammed M. Qaid; Gamaleldin M. Suliman; Mohammed A. Al-Badwi; Esam H. Fazea; Isiaka O. Olarinre
Source: Cogent Food & Agriculture, Vol 11, Iss 1 (2025)
Publisher Information: Taylor & Francis Group, 2025.
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: LCC:Agriculture; LCC:Food processing and manufacture
Subject Terms: Broilers meat quality; consumer perception; feed efficiency; nutrient requirements; phytogenic feed additives; production efficiency; Agriculture; Food processing and manufacture; TP368-456
Description: This study investigated the impact of reduced dietary metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) levels on broiler breast meat quality, internal organ yields, feed efficiency (FE), and the European production efficiency factor (EPEF), with or without phytogenic feed additive (PFA) or prebiotic supplementation. Two base diets were used: a reduced-energy and protein diet (−1.5% ME, −5% amino acid density) as the negative control (NC1) and a standard corn–soybean diet as the positive control (PC1). Each was supplemented with PFA (0.15% or 0.25%) or 0.10% prebiotic, resulting in eight treatments. A total of 576 Ross 308 chicks were allocated to these treatments and reared for 35 days. The results showed that reduced ME and CP diets impaired meat quality and performance, with NC1 showing the poorest results. Supplementation with 0.25% PFA in the PC1 diet improved water holding capacity (+6.32%), reduced drip loss (−25.38%) and cooking loss (−27.29%), enhanced tenderness of breast meat, and improved FE (+4.7%) and EPEF (+12.9%). Organ weights improved under NC1 with 0.25% PFA, and prebiotics improved meat color. In conclusion, while ME and CP reduction impaired broiler performance and meat quality, PFA-especially at 0.25% in a standard diet-effectively mitigated these effects.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2331-1932
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2331-1932
DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2025.2531964
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/fa9ff0d9643f48eeafc5ca052d038de6
Accession Number: edsdoj.fa9ff0d9643f48eeafc5ca052d038de6
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals