Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus Directory of Open Access Journals kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Recommended reporting items for epidemic forecasting and prediction research: The EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines.

Title: Recommended reporting items for epidemic forecasting and prediction research: The EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines.
Authors: Simon Pollett; Michael A Johansson; Nicholas G Reich; David Brett-Major; Sara Y Del Valle; Srinivasan Venkatramanan; Rachel Lowe; Travis Porco; Irina Maljkovic Berry; Alina Deshpande; Moritz U G Kraemer; David L Blazes; Wirichada Pan-Ngum; Alessandro Vespigiani; Suzanne E Mate; Sheetal P Silal; Sasikiran Kandula; Rachel Sippy; Talia M Quandelacy; Jeffrey J Morgan; Jacob Ball; Lindsay C Morton; Benjamin M Althouse; Julie Pavlin; Wilbert van Panhuis; Steven Riley; Matthew Biggerstaff; Cecile Viboud; Oliver Brady; Caitlin Rivers
Source: PLoS Medicine, Vol 18, Iss 10, p e1003793 (2021)
Publisher Information: Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2021.
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: LCC:Medicine
Subject Terms: Medicine
Description: BackgroundThe importance of infectious disease epidemic forecasting and prediction research is underscored by decades of communicable disease outbreaks, including COVID-19. Unlike other fields of medical research, such as clinical trials and systematic reviews, no reporting guidelines exist for reporting epidemic forecasting and prediction research despite their utility. We therefore developed the EPIFORGE checklist, a guideline for standardized reporting of epidemic forecasting research.Methods and findingsWe developed this checklist using a best-practice process for development of reporting guidelines, involving a Delphi process and broad consultation with an international panel of infectious disease modelers and model end users. The objectives of these guidelines are to improve the consistency, reproducibility, comparability, and quality of epidemic forecasting reporting. The guidelines are not designed to advise scientists on how to perform epidemic forecasting and prediction research, but rather to serve as a standard for reporting critical methodological details of such studies.ConclusionsThese guidelines have been submitted to the EQUATOR network, in addition to hosting by other dedicated webpages to facilitate feedback and journal endorsement.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1549-1277; 1549-1676
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277; https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003793
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/fc1761a3921747ac8ce19dfe4e62320d
Accession Number: edsdoj.fc1761a3921747ac8ce19dfe4e62320d
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals