Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus OAIster kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Online Fake News Opinion Spread and Belief Change: A Systematic Review

Title: Online Fake News Opinion Spread and Belief Change: A Systematic Review
Authors: Duradoni, M; Altoe, F; Moreira, C; Pinto, HS; Jorge, JA
Publisher Information: WILEY-HINDAWI 2024-01-01
Document Type: Electronic Resource
Abstract: Fake news has been linked to the rise of psychological disorders, the increased disbelief in science, and the erosion of democracy and freedom of speech. Online social networks are arguably the main vehicle of fake news spread. Educating online users with explanations is one way of preventing this spread. Understanding how online belief is formed and changed may offer a roadmap for such education. The literature includes surveys addressing online opinion formation and polarization; however, they usually address a single domain, such as politics, online marketing, health, and education, and do not make online belief change their primary focus. Unlike other studies, this work is the first to present a cross-domain systematic literature review of user studies, methodologies, and opinion model dimensions. It also includes the orthogonal polarization dimension, focusing on online belief change. We include peer-reviewed works published in 2020 and later found in four relevant scientific databases, excluding theoretical publications that did not offer validation through dataset experimentation or simulation. Bibliometric networks were constructed for better visualization, leading to the organization of the papers that passed the review criteria into a comprehensive taxonomy. Our findings show that a person's individuality is the most significant influential force in online belief change. We show that online arguments that balance facts with emotionally evoking content are more efficient in changing their beliefs. Polarization was shown to be cross-correlated among multiple subjects, with politics being the central polarization pole. Polarized online networks start as networks with high opinion segregation, evolve into subnetworks of consensus, and achieve polarization around social network influencers. Trust in the information source was demonstrated to be the chief psychological construct that drives online users to polarization. This shows that changing the beliefs of in
Index Terms: Journal Article
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10453/185013; Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies; 10.1155/2024/1069670
Availability: Open access content. Open access content; This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Other Numbers: LT1 oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/185013; Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024, 2024, (1); 2578-1863; 2578-1863; 1508032445
Contributing Source: UNIV OF TECH, SYDNEY; From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative.
Accession Number: edsoai.on1508032445
Database: OAIster