Can small urban communities survive?

Titel: Can small urban communities survive? : culturological analysis in urban rehabilitation : cases in Slovenia and Scotland / Branka Berce-Bratko
Verfasser:
Veröffentlicht: Aldershot : Ashgate, 2001
Umfang: XVIII, 281 Seiten
Format: Buch
Sprache: Englisch
Schriftenreihe/
mehrbändiges Werk:
Contemporary trends in European social sciences
Hochschulschrift: Dissertation, Glasgow, Univ. of Strathclyde, 2001
RVK-Notation:
Schlagworte:
ISBN: 9781840141573 ; 1840141573
Lokale Klassifikation: 56 13 M ; 56 2 J ; 56 13 C ; 57 Großbritannien ; 56 8 L 6
  • List of Figures and Tables
  • p. viii
  • List of Abbreviations
  • p. xi
  • Acknowledgements
  • p. xii
  • Preface
  • p. xiii
  • Abstract
  • p. xv
  • Summary in Slovene
  • p. xvi
  • 1
  • About Small Urban Communities
  • Introduction and Objectives
  • p. 1
  • Culturological Concepts
  • p. 8
  • The State of the Art - Theoretical Background
  • p. 14
  • Ethnology and Anthropology-based Review
  • p. 14
  • Ecology, Sociology and Psychology-based Review
  • p. 18
  • Culture and Design-based Review
  • p. 25
  • Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Approaches
  • p. 29
  • Broader Perceptions of Planning
  • p. 38
  • Planning Education
  • p. 39
  • Participation in Planning
  • p. 41
  • Comparative Planning Studies
  • p. 44
  • Conclusions
  • p. 44
  • 2
  • Practice in Conservation and Rehabilitation
  • Review of Practice in Conservation, Urban Renewal and Rehabilitation in Selected European Countries
  • p. 47
  • Symbolism, Conservation and Renewal
  • p. 48
  • Slovenia and Practice in Urban Settlements
  • p. 50
  • Cultural Regions
  • p. 52
  • Scotland and Rehabilitation Practice
  • p. 59
  • Conservation and Rehabilitation in Scottish Cities
  • p. 61
  • Comparative Appraisal: the Slow Development of Culturological Analysis (CA)
  • p. 75
  • Different Countries' Profiles of Conservation and Rehabilitation Programmes in Terms of CA Development
  • p. 76
  • Conclusions
  • p. 88
  • 3
  • How to Explore Small Urban Communities?
  • Research Methodology: Principles of the Case Studies
  • p. 91
  • Choice of Study Areas
  • p. 92
  • Case Study A
  • Ljubljana and Glasgow
  • p. 92
  • Case Study B
  • Krsko and Garnethill
  • p. 96
  • Case Study C
  • Kostanjevica and Calvay
  • p. 97
  • Methodology Used in Case Study A
  • p. 97
  • Methodology Used in Case Studies B and C
  • p. 102
  • The Differing Approach to Case Studies
  • p. 104
  • 4
  • Cases of Small Urban Communities
  • Comparison between Scotland and Slovenia
  • p. 106
  • The Context of the Case Areas
  • p. 108
  • Case Study A
  • Ljubljana and Glasgow
  • p. 109
  • A 1
  • Stara Siska
  • p. 109
  • A 2
  • Litostroj
  • p. 115
  • A 3
  • Kodeljevo
  • p. 119
  • A 4
  • Stepanjsko Naselje
  • p. 125
  • A 5
  • Garnethill
  • p. 132
  • A 6
  • Calvay
  • p. 137
  • A 7
  • Bishopbriggs
  • p. 141
  • A 8
  • Wynford
  • p. 146
  • Comparison of Category B Places by Coefficients
  • p. 151
  • Case Study B
  • Krsko and Garnethill
  • p. 152
  • B 1
  • Krsko
  • p. 152
  • The Role of Rehabilitation of the Old Town Centre in Krsko
  • p. 153
  • Initial Culturological Analysis (CA) of the Old Town Centre
  • p. 157
  • Results of Fieldwork for CA
  • p. 158
  • People Evaluating their Living Environment
  • p. 166
  • Resident's Choice of Natural and Built Heritage
  • p. 167
  • Suggested Buildings and Surroundings for Listing
  • p. 168
  • Culturological Assessment of Inner City Areas
  • p. 170
  • Ethnological Assessment of Living Environment-EDZs
  • p. 172
  • Acceptability for Development of Ethnologically Assessed Areas
  • p. 174
  • Social Strategy
  • p. 175
  • Comparison between Krsko in 1984 and 1992 Monitoring CA- Assessing the Effectiveness of Rehabilitation in Krsko
  • p. 180
  • Conclusions
  • p. 185
  • Case B2
  • Garnethill
  • p. 186
  • B 2.1
  • Garnethill - Scottish Enclave
  • p. 187
  • B 2.2
  • Garnethill - Chinese Enclave
  • p. 193
  • B 2.3
  • Garnethill - The Pakistani and Indian Enclaves
  • p. 196
  • Conclusions for Garnethill
  • p. 203
  • Case Study C
  • Kostanjevica and Calvay
  • p. 205
  • C 1
  • Kostanjevica
  • p. 205
  • C 2
  • Calvay
  • p. 218
  • General Conclusions for Case Studies A, B and C
  • p. 230
  • 5
  • What has been Established?
  • Using Culturological Analysis in the Formulation of Rehabilitation Projects
  • p. 236
  • Evaluation of Method by Case Studies A, B and C
  • p. 237
  • Case Study A Method
  • p. 237
  • Case Study B Method
  • p. 240
  • Case Study C Method
  • p. 245
  • General Conclusions: the Scope of Culturological Analysis
  • p. 246
  • Quantitative Criteria
  • p. 248
  • Qualitative Criteria
  • p. 249
  • Criteria for "Rational" Rehabilitation
  • p. 249
  • Planning and Culturological Analysis
  • p. 251
  • Evaluation of the Theoretical Basis of the Method Used
  • p. 253
  • Conclusions
  • p. 257
  • 6
  • Yes, Small Urban Communities Can Survive and Revive
  • Using CA in the Formulation of Rehabilitation Projects and Planning
  • p. 258
  • Guidelines for Implementation of CA
  • p. 259
  • How to Apply CA in the Context of Planning and Housing Action Area Procedures
  • p. 265
  • Suggestions for Research to Sustain Small Urban Communities
  • p. 270
  • References
  • p. 272