Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty: A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution
| Titel: | Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty: A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution |
|---|---|
| Veröffentlicht: | [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : Springer, 2016 |
| Umfang: | 1 Online Ressource |
| Format: | E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| ISBN: | 9783319424040 ; 9783319424057 |
X
alg: 42142710 001A $06055:22-11-17 001B $01999:04-06-25 $t13:41:37.000 001D $06055:22-11-17 001U $0utf8 001X $00 002@ $0Oax 002C $aText $btxt $2rdacontent 002D $aComputermedien $bc $2rdamedia 002E $aOnline-Ressource $bcr $2rdacarrier 003@ $0421427108 004A $A978-3-319-42404-0 004A $A978-3-319-42405-7 007A $0421427108 $aHEB 007I $0oapen-20.500.12657/31348 009Q $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $xR 010@ $aeng 011@ $a2016 013D $RWissenschaftliche Literatur $RAufsatzsammlung $#Konferenzbericht $71071861417 $8Konferenzschrift [Tsz] $9359646190 017B $aZDB-94-OAL 021A $aReconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty: A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution 033A $p[Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] $nSpringer 033E $pThe Hague $nOapen Foundation 034D $a1 Online Ressource 044A $aLaw $2bicssc $N650 044A $aConstitutional law $N653 044K $as, Konstitutionalismus $qDNB 044K $as, Souveränität $qDNB 044K $qDNB $#Abendland $#Okzident $74015701-5 $8Europa [Tgz] $908503617X 044K $qDNB $RStaatsform $#Constitutionnalisme $#Konstitutionalismus $74165087-6 $8Konstitutionalismus [Ts1] $9085738069 044K $qDNB $#Sovereignty $#Souveraineté $#Souveränität $#Souveränität $#Innere Souveränität $#Souveränität $#Unabhängigkeit von Staaten (internationales Recht) $#Nationale Souveränität $#Staatssouveränität $#Staat Souveränität $#Staatliche Souveränität $74132367-1 $8Souveränität [Ts1] $9085475963 045E $c340 $c940 045R $aGeschichte 1788-1861 047A $aSacherschließung maschinell aus paralleler Ausg. übernommen 047I $aThis open access book can be downloaded from link.springer.comLegal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics. Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be ‘believed’ by the subjects and the political élites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processes became palpable in the ‘religious’ affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as ‘creeds’ of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents’ big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the ‘renaissance’ of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cádiz Constitution 1812). Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu)... lok: 42142710 3 exp: 42142710 3 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:40.998 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01011894491 208@/01 $a22-11-17 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 5 exp: 42142710 5 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.010 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01026800846 208@/01 $a28-08-18 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 8 exp: 42142710 8 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.016 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01011894505 208@/01 $a22-11-17 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 10 exp: 42142710 10 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.021 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01011894513 208@/01 $a22-11-17 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 11 exp: 42142710 11 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.025 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01026800854 208@/01 $a28-08-18 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 13 exp: 42142710 13 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.028 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01026800862 208@/01 $a28-08-18 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 20 exp: 42142710 20 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.031 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01011894521 208@/01 $a22-11-17 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 21 exp: 42142710 21 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.034 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $0101189453X 208@/01 $a22-11-17 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 23 exp: 42142710 23 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.048 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01011894548 208@/01 $a22-11-17 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 24 exp: 42142710 24 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.054 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01026800870 208@/01 $a28-08-18 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 25 exp: 42142710 25 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.059 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01011894556 208@/01 $a22-11-17 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 36 exp: 42142710 36 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.076 201C/01 $013-10-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01277794979 208@/01 $a13-10-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 49 exp: 42142710 49 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.079 201C/01 $029-05-20 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01108411703 208@/01 $a29-05-20 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 51 exp: 42142710 51 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.097 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01026800897 208@/01 $a28-08-18 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 54 exp: 42142710 54 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.107 201C/01 $029-05-20 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01108411711 208@/01 $a29-05-20 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 74 exp: 42142710 74 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.116 201C/01 $013-10-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01277794987 208@/01 $a13-10-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 75 exp: 42142710 75 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.140 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01026800919 208@/01 $a28-08-18 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 107 exp: 42142710 107 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.145 201C/01 $029-05-20 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $0110841172X 208@/01 $a29-05-20 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 108 exp: 42142710 108 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.148 201C/01 $029-05-20 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01108411738 208@/01 $a29-05-20 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 204 exp: 42142710 204 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.173 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01011894564 208@/01 $a22-11-17 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR lok: 42142710 205 exp: 42142710 205 1 #EPN 201B/01 $004-06-25 $t01:04:41.177 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01011894572 208@/01 $a22-11-17 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 $XR
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 421427108 | ||
| 003 | DE-603 | ||
| 005 | 20250604134137.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 171122s2016 xx |||| o| u10||u|eng c | ||
| 020 | |a 9783319424040 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783319424057 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)HEB421427108 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-603 |b ger |c DE-603 |d DE-603 | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 340 |a 940 |q DE-101 |2 sdnb | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty: A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution |
| 264 | 1 | |a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] |b Springer |c 2016 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a The Hague |b Oapen Foundation | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This open access book can be downloaded from link.springer.comLegal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics. Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be ‘believed’ by the subjects and the political élites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processes became palpable in the ‘religious’ affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as ‘creeds’ of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents’ big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the ‘renaissance’ of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cádiz Constitution 1812). Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu)... | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1788-1861 |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Konstitutionalismus |0 (DE-588)4165087-6 |0 (DE-603)085738069 |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Souveränität |0 (DE-588)4132367-1 |0 (DE-603)085475963 |2 gnd | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Europa |0 (DE-588)4015701-5 |0 (DE-603)08503617X |2 gnd | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Konferenzschrift |2 gnd-content |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |0 (DE-603)359646190 | |
| 856 | |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31348 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-94-OAL | ||
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1011894491 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1026800846 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1011894505 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1011894513 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1026800854 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1026800862 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1011894521 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)101189453X |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1011894548 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1026800870 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1011894556 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1277794979 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1108411703 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1026800897 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1108411711 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1277794987 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1026800919 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)110841172X |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1108411738 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1011894564 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1011894572 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
