Making an administrative trustee agent accountable: reason-based decision making within the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism

Titel: Making an administrative trustee agent accountable: reason-based decision making within the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism
Verfasser: ;
Veröffentlicht: Mannheim, 2009
Umfang: Online-Ressource
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
Kein Bild verfügbar
X
alg: 45164340
001A    $06000:09-08-19 
001B    $01999:02-06-25 $t23:36:34.000 
001D    $06000:09-08-19 
001U    $0utf8 
001X    $00 
002@    $0Oax 
002C    $aText $btxt $2rdacontent 
002D    $aComputermedien $bc $2rdamedia 
002E    $aOnline-Ressource $bcr $2rdacarrier 
003@    $0451643402 
004E/07 $0oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/13063 
004U    $0urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-130637 
006G    $01190974002 
006U    $019,O08 $f20190720 
007A    $01190974002 $aDNB 
009Q    $uhttps://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-130637 $xR 
009Q    $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $xH 
010@    $aeng 
011@    $a2009 $n2009 
021A    $aMaking an administrative trustee agent accountable: reason-based decision making within the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism 
028A    $aGehring $BVerfasser $dThomas $4aut 
028C    $aPlocher $BVerfasser $dIsabel $4aut 
033A    $pMannheim 
034D    $aOnline-Ressource 
037A    $aVeröffentlichungsversion 
037A    $abegutachtet 
037A    $aIn: International Studies Quarterly ; 53 (2009) 3 ; 669-693 
045E    $c320 
047I    $aAbstract: "Decisions within the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol are made by an expert body that acts as a trustee agent of the member states. Trustee agents help overcome the credible commitment problems of their principals and promise reason-based decisions. In contrast to traditional principal-agent settings, trusteeship relations are typically triadic. Beside the preferences of the principals and the trustee, decision criteria provide an external point of reference. They reflect the principals' long-term interest and define the trustee's decision rationale. The triadic structure helps protect the autonomy of trustees and allows for making them accountable for their decisions. Accountability mechanisms intend to ensure that a trustee's decisions are in line with established decision criteria. Against this backdrop, we explore the incentives created by the existing institutional arrangement for the making of CDM decisions and examine selected cases. We conclude that 

lok: 45164340 3

exp: 45164340 3 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.551 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137578 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 5

exp: 45164340 5 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.557 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137586 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 8

exp: 45164340 8 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.562 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137594 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 10

exp: 45164340 10 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.569 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137608 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 11

exp: 45164340 11 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.651 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137616 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 20

exp: 45164340 20 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.656 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137624 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 21

exp: 45164340 21 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.664 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137632 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 23

exp: 45164340 23 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.670 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137640 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 24

exp: 45164340 24 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.675 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137659 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 25

exp: 45164340 25 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.681 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137667 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 36

exp: 45164340 36 1 #EPN
201B/01 $002-06-25 $t23:36:34.713 
201C/01 $002-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01305081595 
208@/01 $a02-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 49

exp: 45164340 49 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.686 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137675 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 54

exp: 45164340 54 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.697 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137691 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 108

exp: 45164340 108 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.708 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137713 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 204

exp: 45164340 204 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.713 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01144137721 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH 

lok: 45164340 205

exp: 45164340 205 1 #EPN
201B/01 $025-02-21 $t23:03:27.719 
201C/01 $025-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0114413773X 
208@/01 $a25-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063 $XH
LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 451643402
003 DE-603
005 20250602233634.0
007 cr||||||||||||
008 190809s2009 xx |||| o| u00||u|eng
015 |a 19,O08  |2 dnb 
016 7 |2 DE-101  |a 1190974002 
024 7 |a urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-130637  |2 urn 
028 5 2 |a oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/13063 
035 |a (DE-599)DNB1190974002 
040 |a DE-603  |b ger  |c DE-603  |d DE-603 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 320  |q DE-101  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Gehring, Thomas  |e Verfasser  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Making an administrative trustee agent accountable: reason-based decision making within the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism 
264 1 |a Mannheim  |c 2009 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Veröffentlichungsversion 
500 |a begutachtet 
500 |a In: International Studies Quarterly ; 53 (2009) 3 ; 669-693 
520 |a Abstract: "Decisions within the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol are made by an expert body that acts as a trustee agent of the member states. Trustee agents help overcome the credible commitment problems of their principals and promise reason-based decisions. In contrast to traditional principal-agent settings, trusteeship relations are typically triadic. Beside the preferences of the principals and the trustee, decision criteria provide an external point of reference. They reflect the principals' long-term interest and define the trustee's decision rationale. The triadic structure helps protect the autonomy of trustees and allows for making them accountable for their decisions. Accountability mechanisms intend to ensure that a trustee's decisions are in line with established decision criteria. Against this backdrop, we explore the incentives created by the existing institutional arrangement for the making of CDM decisions and examine selected cases. We conclude that 
700 1 |a Plocher, Isabel  |e Verfasser  |4 aut 
856 |u https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-130637  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13063  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137578  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137586  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137594  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137608  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137616  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137624  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137632  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137640  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137659  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137667  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1305081595  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137675  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137691  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137713  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1144137721  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)114413773X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d