Parliamentary scrutiny of EU law proposals in Denmark: why do governments request a negotiation mandate?

Titel: Parliamentary scrutiny of EU law proposals in Denmark: why do governments request a negotiation mandate?
Verfasser: ;
Körperschaft:
Veröffentlicht: Wien, 2012
Umfang: Online-Ressource, 34 S.
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
Schriftenreihe/
mehrbändiges Werk:
Reihe Politikwissenschaft / Institut für Höhere Studien, Abt. Politikwissenschaft ; Bd. 127
Kein Bild verfügbar
X
alg: 45176586
001A    $06000:09-08-19 
001B    $01999:31-05-25 $t22:43:25.000 
001D    $06000:09-08-19 
001U    $0utf8 
001X    $00 
002@    $0Oax 
002C    $aText $btxt $2rdacontent 
002D    $aComputermedien $bc $2rdamedia 
002E    $aOnline-Ressource $bcr $2rdacarrier 
003@    $0451765869 
004E/07 $0oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/28866 
004U    $0urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-288668 
006G    $0119148954X 
006U    $019,O08 $f20190726 
007A    $0119148954X $aDNB 
009Q    $uhttps://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-288668 $xR 
009Q    $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $xH 
010@    $aeng 
011@    $a2012 $n2012 
021A    $aParliamentary scrutiny of EU law proposals in Denmark: why do governments request a negotiation mandate? 
028A    $aFinke $BVerfasser $dDaniel $4aut 
028C    $aMelzer $BVerfasser $dMarius $4aut 
029F    $aInstitut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien $BHerausgeber $4edt 
033A    $pWien 
034D    $aOnline-Ressource, 34 S. 
036E    $aReihe Politikwissenschaft / Institut für Höhere Studien, Abt. Politikwissenschaft $lBd. 127 
037A    $aVeröffentlichungsversion 
037A    $abegutachtet 
045E    $c320 
047I    $aAbstract: "Political scientists have been concerned about the loss of power of national parliaments through the shift of competences to the EU level. In this respect the Danish system of parliamentary scrutiny has been recommended as being highly effective. In this paper, we explain why the Folketing issues negotiation mandates on some EU law proposals whereas the government can freely chose its negotiation position on other proposals. Our empirical analysis of Danish scrutiny decision between 2006 and 2008 uncovers three answers. First, in contrast to other scrutiny measures, most of which can be initiated by single party groups, the issuance of negotiation mandates is a collective decision. Specifically, it requires the consent of a majority of deputies in the Folketing. As a consequence, the position of the minority government must win the support of a third party. This third party tends to requests a negotiation mandate if it fears that collusion between the government and its internatio 

lok: 45176586 3

exp: 45176586 3 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.522 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143293959 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 5

exp: 45176586 5 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.529 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143293967 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 8

exp: 45176586 8 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.535 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143293975 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 10

exp: 45176586 10 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.542 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143293983 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 11

exp: 45176586 11 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.548 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143293991 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 20

exp: 45176586 20 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.554 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143294009 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 21

exp: 45176586 21 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.561 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143294017 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 23

exp: 45176586 23 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.567 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143294025 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 24

exp: 45176586 24 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.573 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143294033 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 25

exp: 45176586 25 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.579 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143294041 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 36

exp: 45176586 36 1 #EPN
201B/01 $031-05-25 $t22:43:25.703 
201C/01 $031-05-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01305045408 
208@/01 $a31-05-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 49

exp: 45176586 49 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.587 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0114329405X 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 54

exp: 45176586 54 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.600 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143294076 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 108

exp: 45176586 108 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.612 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143294092 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 204

exp: 45176586 204 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.619 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143294106 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH 

lok: 45176586 205

exp: 45176586 205 1 #EPN
201B/01 $023-02-21 $t22:56:17.625 
201C/01 $023-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143294114 
208@/01 $a23-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866 $XH
LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 451765869
003 DE-603
005 20250531224325.0
007 cr||||||||||||
008 190809s2012 xx |||| o| u00||u|eng
015 |a 19,O08  |2 dnb 
016 7 |2 DE-101  |a 119148954X 
024 7 |a urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-288668  |2 urn 
028 5 2 |a oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/28866 
035 |a (DE-599)DNB119148954X 
040 |a DE-603  |b ger  |c DE-603  |d DE-603 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 320  |q DE-101  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Finke, Daniel  |e Verfasser  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Parliamentary scrutiny of EU law proposals in Denmark: why do governments request a negotiation mandate? 
264 1 |a Wien  |c 2012 
300 |a Online-Ressource, 34 S. 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Reihe Politikwissenschaft / Institut für Höhere Studien, Abt. Politikwissenschaft  |v Bd. 127 
500 |a Veröffentlichungsversion 
500 |a begutachtet 
520 |a Abstract: "Political scientists have been concerned about the loss of power of national parliaments through the shift of competences to the EU level. In this respect the Danish system of parliamentary scrutiny has been recommended as being highly effective. In this paper, we explain why the Folketing issues negotiation mandates on some EU law proposals whereas the government can freely chose its negotiation position on other proposals. Our empirical analysis of Danish scrutiny decision between 2006 and 2008 uncovers three answers. First, in contrast to other scrutiny measures, most of which can be initiated by single party groups, the issuance of negotiation mandates is a collective decision. Specifically, it requires the consent of a majority of deputies in the Folketing. As a consequence, the position of the minority government must win the support of a third party. This third party tends to requests a negotiation mandate if it fears that collusion between the government and its internatio 
700 1 |a Melzer, Marius  |e Verfasser  |4 aut 
710 2 |a Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien  |e Herausgeber  |4 edt 
856 |u https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-288668  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28866  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143293959  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143293967  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143293975  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143293983  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143293991  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143294009  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143294017  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143294025  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143294033  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143294041  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1305045408  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)114329405X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143294076  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143294092  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143294106  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143294114  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d