Relevance of Copenhagen Criteria in Actual Accession: Principles, Methods and Shortcomings of EU Pre-accession Evaluation

Titel: Relevance of Copenhagen Criteria in Actual Accession: Principles, Methods and Shortcomings of EU Pre-accession Evaluation
Verfasser:
Veröffentlicht: Mannheim : SSOAR, 2011
Umfang: Online-Ressource
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
Kein Bild verfügbar
X
alg: 45177825
001A    $06000:09-08-19 
001B    $01999:01-06-25 $t08:01:17.000 
001D    $06000:09-08-19 
001U    $0utf8 
001X    $00 
002@    $0Oax 
002C    $aText $btxt $2rdacontent 
002D    $aComputermedien $bc $2rdamedia 
002E    $aOnline-Ressource $bcr $2rdacarrier 
003@    $0451778251 
004E/07 $0oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/36378 
004U    $0urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-363786 
006G    $01191514242 
006U    $019,O08 $f20190726 
007A    $01191514242 $aDNB 
009Q    $uhttps://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-363786 $xR 
009Q    $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $xH 
010@    $aeng 
011@    $a2011 $n2011 
021A    $aRelevance of Copenhagen Criteria in Actual Accession: Principles, Methods and Shortcomings of EU Pre-accession Evaluation 
028A    $aVeebel $BVerfasser $dViljar $4aut 
033A    $pMannheim $nSSOAR 
034D    $aOnline-Ressource 
037A    $aVeröffentlichungsversion 
037A    $abegutachtet (peer reviewed) 
037A    $aIn: Studies of Transition States and Societies ; 3 (2011) 3 ; 3-23 
045E    $c320 
047I    $aAbstract: "This paper will analyse the transparency, impartiality and objectiveness of the European Union’s (EU) pre-accession assessment procedure. The principal aim is to test and analyse whether the EU follows official and objective criteria in its progress reports or if is it dominated by institutional and national interests. The central questions of the paper are: What were the main motivators of the EU’s independent closed assessment system for the pre-accession process and what influence did this have on the accession process during the years 2004–2006? To answer these questions, the paper will compare the European Commission’s (Commission) progress reports on selected candidate countries with the assessments of six other respected research centres: the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, Freedom House, the Bertelsmann Foundation, Transparency International, Fraser Institute and the Heritage Foundation. If the evaluation results of the EU differ significantly or systematicall 

lok: 45177825 3

exp: 45177825 3 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.174 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524101 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 5

exp: 45177825 5 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.179 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0114352411X 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 8

exp: 45177825 8 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.184 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524128 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 10

exp: 45177825 10 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.188 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524136 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 11

exp: 45177825 11 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.193 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524144 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 20

exp: 45177825 20 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.197 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524152 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 21

exp: 45177825 21 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.201 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524160 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 23

exp: 45177825 23 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.206 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524179 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 24

exp: 45177825 24 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.210 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524187 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 25

exp: 45177825 25 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.214 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524195 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 36

exp: 45177825 36 1 #EPN
201B/01 $001-06-25 $t08:01:17.806 
201C/01 $001-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01305050258 
208@/01 $a01-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 49

exp: 45177825 49 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.219 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524209 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 54

exp: 45177825 54 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.229 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524225 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 108

exp: 45177825 108 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.237 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524241 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 204

exp: 45177825 204 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.241 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0114352425X 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH 

lok: 45177825 205

exp: 45177825 205 1 #EPN
201B/01 $024-02-21 $t22:58:28.245 
201C/01 $024-02-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01143524268 
208@/01 $a24-02-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378 $XH
LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 451778251
003 DE-603
005 20250601080117.0
007 cr||||||||||||
008 190809s2011 xx |||| o| u00||u|eng
015 |a 19,O08  |2 dnb 
016 7 |2 DE-101  |a 1191514242 
024 7 |a urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-363786  |2 urn 
028 5 2 |a oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/36378 
035 |a (DE-599)DNB1191514242 
040 |a DE-603  |b ger  |c DE-603  |d DE-603 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 320  |q DE-101  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Veebel, Viljar  |e Verfasser  |4 aut 
245 0 0 |a Relevance of Copenhagen Criteria in Actual Accession: Principles, Methods and Shortcomings of EU Pre-accession Evaluation 
264 1 |a Mannheim  |b SSOAR  |c 2011 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Veröffentlichungsversion 
500 |a begutachtet (peer reviewed) 
500 |a In: Studies of Transition States and Societies ; 3 (2011) 3 ; 3-23 
520 |a Abstract: "This paper will analyse the transparency, impartiality and objectiveness of the European Union’s (EU) pre-accession assessment procedure. The principal aim is to test and analyse whether the EU follows official and objective criteria in its progress reports or if is it dominated by institutional and national interests. The central questions of the paper are: What were the main motivators of the EU’s independent closed assessment system for the pre-accession process and what influence did this have on the accession process during the years 2004–2006? To answer these questions, the paper will compare the European Commission’s (Commission) progress reports on selected candidate countries with the assessments of six other respected research centres: the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, Freedom House, the Bertelsmann Foundation, Transparency International, Fraser Institute and the Heritage Foundation. If the evaluation results of the EU differ significantly or systematicall 
856 |u https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-363786  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/36378  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524101  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)114352411X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524128  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524136  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524144  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524152  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524160  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524179  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524187  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524195  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1305050258  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524209  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524225  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524241  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)114352425X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1143524268  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d