Difficult folk?

Titel: Difficult folk? : a political history of social anthropology / David Mills
Verfasser:
Ausgabe: Open access ebook edition.
Veröffentlicht: New York : Berghahn Books, 2018
Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
Schriftenreihe/
mehrbändiges Werk:
Methodology and history in anthropology ; volume 19
ISBN: 9781785336638 ; 1785336630
alg: 46050874
001A    $06055:04-03-20 
001B    $01999:17-10-24 $t07:28:18.000 
001D    $06055:04-03-20 
001U    $0utf8 
001X    $00 
002@    $0Oax 
002C    $aText $btxt $2rdacontent 
002D    $aComputermedien $bc $2rdamedia 
002E    $aOnline-Ressource $bcr $2rdacarrier 
003@    $0460508741 
004A    $A978-1-78533-663-8 
004A    $01-78533-663-0 
006C    $01078639435 $aOCoLC 
007A    $0460508741 $aHEB 
007I    $0JBK-10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 
009Q    $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $xH 
010@    $aeng 
011@    $a2018 
017B    $aZDB-39-JOA 
021A    $aDifficult folk? $da political history of social anthropology $hDavid Mills 
027A    $aPolitical history of social anthropology 
028A    $BVerfasser $#Mills, David Shane $#Mills, David S. $4aut $D20220215 $Ecgwrk $7136833616 $8Mills, David$Z1969- [Tp1] $920740562X 
032@    $aOpen access ebook edition. 
033A    $pNew York $nBerghahn Books 
033E    $pNew York $nJSTOR 
034D    $a1 Online-Ressource 
036E    $aMethodology and history in anthropology $lvolume 19 
037A    $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 189-203) and index 
044A    $aEthnology $S#0 $xPolitical aspects $zGreat Britain $N650 
044A    $aEthnology $S#0 $xHistory $y20th century $zGreat Britain $N650 
044A    $aEthnology $2fast $S#7 $N650 
044A    $aEthnology $2fast $S#7 $xPolitical aspects $N650 
044A    $aPOLITICAL SCIENCE $2bisacsh $S#7 $xPublic Policy $xCultural Policy $N650 
044A    $aSOCIAL SCIENCE $2bisacsh $S#7 $xAnthropology $xCultural $N650 
044A    $aSOCIAL SCIENCE $2bisacsh $S#7 $xPopular Culture $N650 
044A    $aHistory $2fast $S#7 $N655 
045B    $a306.20941 $eDDC23eng 
045E    $c300 $c320 $c900 
047I    $aHow should we tell the histories of academic disciplines? All too often, the political and institutional dimensions of knowledge production are lost beneath the intellectual debates. This book redresses the balance. Written in a narrative style and drawing on archival sources and oral histories, it depicts the complex pattern of personal and administrative relationships that shape scholarly worlds. Focusing on the field of social anthropology in twentieth-century Britain, this book describes individual, departmental and institutional rivalries over funding and influence. It examines the efforts of scholars such as Bronislaw Malinowski, Edward Evans-Pritchard and Max Gluckman to further their own visions for social anthropology. Did the future lie with the humanities or the social sciences, with addressing social problems or developing scholarly autonomy? This new history situates the discipline's rise within the post-war expansion of British universities and the challenges created by the end of Empire. 

lok: 46050874 3

exp: 46050874 3 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-03-20 $t22:58:13.227 
201C/01 $004-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01085266869 
208@/01 $a04-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 5

exp: 46050874 5 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:10.863 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300491 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 8

exp: 46050874 8 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-03-20 $t22:58:13.238 
201C/01 $004-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01085266877 
208@/01 $a04-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 10

exp: 46050874 10 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-03-20 $t22:58:13.246 
201C/01 $004-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01085266885 
208@/01 $a04-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 11

exp: 46050874 11 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:10.872 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300505 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 13

exp: 46050874 13 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:10.880 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300513 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 20

exp: 46050874 20 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-03-20 $t22:58:13.266 
201C/01 $004-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01085266893 
208@/01 $a04-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 21

exp: 46050874 21 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-03-20 $t22:58:13.278 
201C/01 $004-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01085266907 
208@/01 $a04-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 23

exp: 46050874 23 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-03-20 $t22:58:13.294 
201C/01 $004-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01085266915 
208@/01 $a04-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 24

exp: 46050874 24 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:10.896 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300521 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 25

exp: 46050874 25 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-03-20 $t22:58:13.306 
201C/01 $004-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01085266923 
208@/01 $a04-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 36

exp: 46050874 36 1 #EPN
201B/01 $015-10-22 $t00:47:42.662 
201C/01 $014-10-22 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01216047111 
208@/01 $a14-10-22 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 49

exp: 46050874 49 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:10.904 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0108630053X 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 51

exp: 46050874 51 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:10.932 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300556 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 54

exp: 46050874 54 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:10.939 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300564 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 59

exp: 46050874 59 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:10.968 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300580 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 69

exp: 46050874 69 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:10.983 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300599 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 75

exp: 46050874 75 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:10.999 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300610 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 76

exp: 46050874 76 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:11.016 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300629 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 107

exp: 46050874 107 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:11.023 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300637 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 108

exp: 46050874 108 1 #EPN
201B/01 $007-03-20 $t22:23:11.040 
201C/01 $007-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01086300645 
208@/01 $a07-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 204

exp: 46050874 204 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-03-20 $t22:58:13.318 
201C/01 $004-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01085266931 
208@/01 $a04-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH 

lok: 46050874 205

exp: 46050874 205 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-03-20 $t22:58:13.338 
201C/01 $004-03-20 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0108526694X 
208@/01 $a04-03-20 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66 $XH
LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 460508741
003 DE-603
005 20241017072818.0
007 cr||||||||||||
008 200304s2018 xx |||| o| u00||u|eng c
020 |a 9781785336638 
020 |a 1785336630 
035 |a (DE-599)HEB460508741 
040 |a DE-603  |b ger  |c DE-603  |d DE-603 
041 |a eng 
082 7 |a 306.20941  |2 23/eng 
084 |a 300  |a 320  |a 900  |q DE-101  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Mills, David  |d 1969-  |e Verfasser  |4 aut  |0 (DE-603)20740562X  |0 (DE-588)136833616  |2 gnd 
245 0 0 |a Difficult folk?  |b a political history of social anthropology  |c David Mills 
246 1 3 |a Political history of social anthropology 
250 |a Open access ebook edition. 
264 1 |a New York  |b Berghahn Books  |c 2018 
264 2 |a New York  |b JSTOR 
300 |a 1 Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Methodology and history in anthropology  |v volume 19 
500 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 189-203) and index 
520 |a How should we tell the histories of academic disciplines? All too often, the political and institutional dimensions of knowledge production are lost beneath the intellectual debates. This book redresses the balance. Written in a narrative style and drawing on archival sources and oral histories, it depicts the complex pattern of personal and administrative relationships that shape scholarly worlds. Focusing on the field of social anthropology in twentieth-century Britain, this book describes individual, departmental and institutional rivalries over funding and influence. It examines the efforts of scholars such as Bronislaw Malinowski, Edward Evans-Pritchard and Max Gluckman to further their own visions for social anthropology. Did the future lie with the humanities or the social sciences, with addressing social problems or developing scholarly autonomy? This new history situates the discipline's rise within the post-war expansion of British universities and the challenges created by the end of Empire. 
856 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
912 |a ZDB-39-JOA 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1085266869  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300491  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1085266877  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1085266885  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300505  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300513  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1085266893  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1085266907  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1085266915  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300521  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1085266923  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1216047111  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)108630053X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300556  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300564  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300580  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300599  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300610  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300629  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300637  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1086300645  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1085266931  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)108526694X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d