The Security Sector Governance–Migration Nexus

Titel: The Security Sector Governance–Migration Nexus
Verfasser:
Veröffentlicht: London : Ubiquity Press, 2021
Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (80 Seiten)
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
Schriftenreihe/
mehrbändiges Werk:
SSR Papers ; 1
ISBN: 9781911529927 ; 9781911529934 ; 9781911529941 ; 9781911529958
alg: 48313989
001A    $00026:04-08-21 
001B    $01999:04-06-25 $t15:56:13.000 
001D    $00026:04-08-21 
001U    $0utf8 
001X    $00 
002@    $0Oax 
002C    $aText $btxt $2rdacontent 
002D    $aComputermedien $bc $2rdamedia 
002E    $aOnline-Ressource $bcr $2rdacarrier 
003@    $0483139890 
004A    $A9781911529927 
004A    $A9781911529934 
004A    $A9781911529941 
004A    $A9781911529958 
007A    $0483139890 $aHEB 
007I    $0oapen-20.500.12657/48798 
009Q    $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $xH 
010@    $aeng 
010E    $erda 
011@    $a2021 
017B    $aZDB-94-OAL 
021A    $aThe @Security Sector Governance–Migration Nexus 
027A    $aRethinking how Security Sector Governance matters for migrants’ rights 
028A    $D20231015 $Ecgwrk $71153424940 $8Wolff, Sarah$Z1982- [Tp3] $9426717783 
033A    $pLondon $nUbiquity Press 
033E    $pThe Hague $nOAPEN Foundation 
034D    $a1 Online-Ressource (80 Seiten) 
036E    $aSSR Papers$z2571-9289 $l1 
045E    $c320 
047I    $aThe main argument is that improving migrants’ rights and conceptual linkages between SSG/R and migration is best achieved, by decentring our gaze, namely going beyond the ‘national’ and ‘state-centric’ view that characterizes traditionally SSG/R and to consider the agency of both migrants and SSR actors. First from a migrants’ perspective, it is key for SSR actors to go beyond traditional legal classifications and to consider the diversity of personal situations that involve refugees, stranded migrants and asylum seekers, which might endorse different roles at different times of their journeys and lives. Second, the transnational nature of migration calls for a transnationalization of SSG/R too. For too long the concept has mostly been applied within the national setting of SSR institutions and actors. Migration calls for a clear decentring that involves a transnational dimension and more work among transnational actors and policymakers to facilitate a norm transfer from the domestic to the interstate and international level. As such, the ‘transnational’ nature of migration and its governance needs to be ‘domesticated’ within the national context in order to change the mindset of SSG/R actors and institutions. More importantly, the paper argues that poor SSG/R at home produces refugees and incentivizes migrants to leave their countries after being victims of violence by law enforcement and security services. During migrants’ complex and fragmented journeys, good security sector governance is fundamental to address key challenges faced by these vulnerable groups. I also argue that a better understanding of migrants’ and refugees’ security needs is beneficial and central to the good governance of the security sector. After reviewing the key terms of migration and its drivers in section 2, section 3 reviews how SSG is part of the implementation of the GCM. SSR actors play a role in shaping migratory routes and refugees’ incentives to leave, in explaining migrants’ and refugees’ resilience, in protecting migrants and refugees, and in providing security. Although it cautions against artificial classifications and the term of ‘transit migration’, section 4 reviews what the core challenges are in the countries of origin, transit and destination. Section 5 provides a detailed overview of the linkages between migration and each security actor: the military, police forces, intelligence services, border guards, interior ministries, private actors, criminal justice, parliaments, independent oversight bodies and civil society. Section 6 formulates some recommendations. 

lok: 48313989 3

exp: 48313989 3 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.465 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255068 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 5

exp: 48313989 5 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.477 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255076 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 8

exp: 48313989 8 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.488 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255084 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 10

exp: 48313989 10 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.500 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255092 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 11

exp: 48313989 11 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.510 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255106 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 20

exp: 48313989 20 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.518 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255114 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 21

exp: 48313989 21 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.525 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255122 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 23

exp: 48313989 23 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.533 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255130 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 24

exp: 48313989 24 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.544 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255149 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 25

exp: 48313989 25 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.553 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255157 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 36

exp: 48313989 36 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.561 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255165 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 49

exp: 48313989 49 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.569 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255173 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 54

exp: 48313989 54 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.585 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0116325519X 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 108

exp: 48313989 108 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.601 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255211 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 204

exp: 48313989 204 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.609 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0116325522X 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH 

lok: 48313989 205

exp: 48313989 205 1 #EPN
201B/01 $004-08-21 $t23:29:59.617 
201C/01 $004-08-21 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01163255238 
208@/01 $a04-08-21 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798 $XH
LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 483139890
003 DE-603
005 20250604155613.0
007 cr||||||||||||
008 210804s2021 xx |||| o| u00||u|eng c
020 |a 9781911529927 
020 |a 9781911529934 
020 |a 9781911529941 
020 |a 9781911529958 
035 |a (DE-599)HEB483139890 
040 |a DE-603  |b ger  |c DE-603  |d DE-603  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 320  |q DE-101  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Wolff, Sarah  |d 1982-  |0 (DE-603)426717783  |0 (DE-588)1153424940  |2 gnd 
245 0 0 |a ˜Theœ Security Sector Governance–Migration Nexus 
246 1 3 |a Rethinking how Security Sector Governance matters for migrants’ rights 
264 1 |a London  |b Ubiquity Press  |c 2021 
264 2 |a The Hague  |b OAPEN Foundation 
300 |a 1 Online-Ressource (80 Seiten) 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a SSR Papers$z2571-9289  |v 1 
520 |a The main argument is that improving migrants’ rights and conceptual linkages between SSG/R and migration is best achieved, by decentring our gaze, namely going beyond the ‘national’ and ‘state-centric’ view that characterizes traditionally SSG/R and to consider the agency of both migrants and SSR actors. First from a migrants’ perspective, it is key for SSR actors to go beyond traditional legal classifications and to consider the diversity of personal situations that involve refugees, stranded migrants and asylum seekers, which might endorse different roles at different times of their journeys and lives. Second, the transnational nature of migration calls for a transnationalization of SSG/R too. For too long the concept has mostly been applied within the national setting of SSR institutions and actors. Migration calls for a clear decentring that involves a transnational dimension and more work among transnational actors and policymakers to facilitate a norm transfer from the domestic to the interstate and international level. As such, the ‘transnational’ nature of migration and its governance needs to be ‘domesticated’ within the national context in order to change the mindset of SSG/R actors and institutions. More importantly, the paper argues that poor SSG/R at home produces refugees and incentivizes migrants to leave their countries after being victims of violence by law enforcement and security services. During migrants’ complex and fragmented journeys, good security sector governance is fundamental to address key challenges faced by these vulnerable groups. I also argue that a better understanding of migrants’ and refugees’ security needs is beneficial and central to the good governance of the security sector. After reviewing the key terms of migration and its drivers in section 2, section 3 reviews how SSG is part of the implementation of the GCM. SSR actors play a role in shaping migratory routes and refugees’ incentives to leave, in explaining migrants’ and refugees’ resilience, in protecting migrants and refugees, and in providing security. Although it cautions against artificial classifications and the term of ‘transit migration’, section 4 reviews what the core challenges are in the countries of origin, transit and destination. Section 5 provides a detailed overview of the linkages between migration and each security actor: the military, police forces, intelligence services, border guards, interior ministries, private actors, criminal justice, parliaments, independent oversight bodies and civil society. Section 6 formulates some recommendations. 
856 |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48798  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
912 |a ZDB-94-OAL 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255068  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255076  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255084  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255092  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255106  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255114  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255122  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255130  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255149  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255157  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255165  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255173  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)116325519X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255211  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)116325522X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1163255238  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d