CFSP: the capability-expectation gap revisited

Titel: CFSP: the capability-expectation gap revisited : a data-based analysis / Annegret Bendiek, Minna Ålander and Paul Bochtler ; Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs
Verfasser: ; ;
Körperschaft:
Veröffentlicht: Berlin : SWP, [November 2020]
Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) : 3 Diagramme
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
Schriftenreihe/
mehrbändiges Werk:
SWP comment ; 2020, no. 58 (November 2020)
Einheitssachtitel: GASP: von der Ergebnis- zur Symbolpolitik
Schlagworte:
Andere Ausgaben: Übersetzung von: Bendiek, Annegret, 1970 -. GASP: von der Ergebnis- zur Symbolpolitik. - Berlin : SWP, 2020. - 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten)
Kein Bild verfügbar
X
alg: 51389240
001A    $06000:08-12-23 
001B    $01999:10-12-23 $t01:24:33.000 
001D    $06000:08-12-23 
001U    $0utf8 
001X    $00 
002@    $0Oax 
002C    $aText $btxt $2rdacontent 
002D    $aComputermedien $bc $2rdamedia 
002E    $aOnline-Ressource $bcr $2rdacarrier 
003@    $0513892400 
004P    $010.18449/2020C58 
004U    $0urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023112314203833810743 
006G    $01310931801 
006U    $023,O12 $f20231123 
007A    $01741615941 $aKXP 
009Q    $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $xR 
009Q    $uhttps://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023112314203833810743 $xR 
009Q    $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $xR 
009Q    $qapplication/pdf $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $xH 
010@    $aeng 
010E    $erda 
011@    $a2020 $n[November 2020] 
021A    $aCFSP: the capability-expectation gap revisited $da data-based analysis $hAnnegret Bendiek, Minna Ålander and Paul Bochtler ; Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs 
022A    $aGASP: von der Ergebnis- zur Symbolpolitik 
028A    $BVerfasser $4aut $7129014257 $8Bendiek, Annegret [Tp3] $9159416027 
028C    $BVerfasser $4aut $8Ålander, Minna [Tp3] $9458515299 
028C    $BVerfasser $4aut $71156924251 $8Bochtler, Paul [Tp3] $9428868150 
029F    $BHerausgebendes Organ $#Фонд Науки и Политики $#SWP $#Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit $#Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit $#Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit der Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) $#German Institute for International and Security Affairs $#Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik - Forschungsinstitut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit $#Forschungsinstitut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit $#German Research Institute for International Affairs $4isb $72023076-X $8Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik [Tb1] $9042767121 
033A    $pBerlin $nSWP 
034D    $a1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) 
034M    $a3 Diagramme 
036E    $aSWP comment $l2020, no. 58 (November 2020) 
037A    $a"English version of SWP-Aktuell 86/2020" 
037A    $aGesehen am 01.12.2020 
039M    $aÜbersetzung von $tGASP: von der Ergebnis- zur Symbolpolitik $dBerlin $eSWP $f2020 $h1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) $lBendiek, Annegret, 1970 -  
044K    $qDNB $RIntegration $RWirtschaftliche Integration $#regionale Integration $#Integrationspolitik $#Internationale regionale politische Integration $#Internationale Integration $#Regionale Integration $74161919-5 $8Integration$gInternationale Politik [Ts1] $9085713031 
044K    $qDNB $#Decision making $#Prise de décision $#Entscheidungsprozess $#Entscheidungsprozess $#Entscheidung Ablauf $#Entscheidungsablauf $#Mehrstufige Entscheidung $74121202-2 $8Entscheidungsprozess [Ts1] $9085390763 
044K    $qDNB $ROrganisation $#International agencies $#Organisations internationales $#Organizzazioni internazionali $#Organismos internacionales $#international organizations $#Internationale Organisation $#internationale Organisation $#Entscheidungsinstanz internationaler Organisation $#Internationale gesellschaftliche Vereinigung $#Internationale Organisation $#Internationaler Akteur $#Internationales Gremium/Einrichtung $#Internationales Konsultationsgremium $#Internationales Verwaltungsorgan $#Nationale Sektion internationaler Organisation $#Organisation und Zusammensetzung internationalen Akteurs $#Prozedurale Fragen bei internationalem Akteur $#Rat internationaler Organisation $#Regionale internationale Organisation $#Staatlicher internationaler Akteur $#Untersuchungsfunktion internationaler Akteure $#Internationale Organisationen $74027366-0 $8Internationale Organisation [Ts1] $9085069779 
044K    $qDNB $RWeltpolitik $RAußenpolitik $RInternationales politisches System $#International relations $#Relations internationales $#Relazioni internazionali $#Relaciones internacionales $#Internationale Politik $#internationale Politik $#bilaterale Beziehungen $#internationale Beziehungen $#Internationale Beziehungen $#Politische Beziehungen Internationale Politik $#Zwischenstaatliche Beziehungen $74072885-7 $8Internationale Politik [Tsz] $9085205222 
044K    $qDNB $#Decision making Data processing $#Entscheidungsverfahren $#Entscheidungsprozedur $#Decision procedure $74637781-5 $8Entscheidungsverfahren [Ts1] $9098612433 
045E    $c320 
046X    $aArchivierung/Langzeitarchivierung gewährleistet $5DE-101 
047I    $aZusammenfassung: The global political situation in Europe’s neighbourhood has deteriorated dramatically in recent years, and this has had significant consequences for the European Union (EU). Conflicts are multiplying in Eastern Europe and in the Mediterranean Sea; Russia and China are showing increasingly expansive tendencies in South Eastern Europe; and the USA is becoming less and less reliable as a security provider for Europe. Against this background, it is striking that the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) still falls far short of what would be expected from the EU given the size of its inter­nal market. The unanimity principle in the Council of the EU is often blamed for this. However, an analysis of CFSP data shows that the Member States are clearly satisfied with symbolic policy measures, despite their political rhetoric. This situation will not be resolved either by introducing simple majority voting or with mere declarations of political will from governments. The dialogue on the future of Europe should be seen as an opportunity to remedy the inability to act in the field of foreign policy by har­monising the CFSP 

lok: 51389240 3

exp: 51389240 3 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.144 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0125125201X 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 5

exp: 51389240 5 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.147 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252028 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 8

exp: 51389240 8 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.150 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252036 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 10

exp: 51389240 10 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.153 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252044 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 11

exp: 51389240 11 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.155 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252052 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 20

exp: 51389240 20 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.158 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252060 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 21

exp: 51389240 21 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.160 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252079 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 23

exp: 51389240 23 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.163 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252087 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 24

exp: 51389240 24 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.165 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252095 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 25

exp: 51389240 25 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.182 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252109 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 36

exp: 51389240 36 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.185 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252117 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 49

exp: 51389240 49 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.188 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252125 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 54

exp: 51389240 54 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.193 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252141 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 108

exp: 51389240 108 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.200 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252168 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 204

exp: 51389240 204 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.202 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252176 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH 

lok: 51389240 205

exp: 51389240 205 1 #EPN
201B/01 $010-12-23 $t01:24:33.205 
201C/01 $010-12-23 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01251252184 
208@/01 $a10-12-23 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58 $XR 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf $XH
LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 513892400
003 DE-603
005 20231210012433.0
007 cr||||||||||||
008 231208s2020 xx |||| o| u00||u|eng
015 |a 23,O12  |2 dnb 
016 7 |2 DE-101  |a 1310931801 
024 7 |a 10.18449/2020C58  |2 doi 
024 7 |a urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023112314203833810743  |2 urn 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1741615941 
040 |a DE-603  |b ger  |c DE-603  |d DE-603  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 320  |q DE-101  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Bendiek, Annegret  |e Verfasser  |4 aut  |0 (DE-603)159416027  |0 (DE-588)129014257  |2 gnd 
240 1 0 |a GASP: von der Ergebnis- zur Symbolpolitik 
245 0 0 |a CFSP: the capability-expectation gap revisited  |b a data-based analysis  |c Annegret Bendiek, Minna Ålander and Paul Bochtler ; Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs 
264 1 |a Berlin  |b SWP  |c [November 2020] 
300 |a 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten)  |b 3 Diagramme 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a SWP comment  |v 2020, no. 58 (November 2020) 
500 |a "English version of SWP-Aktuell 86/2020" 
500 |a Gesehen am 01.12.2020 
520 |a Zusammenfassung: The global political situation in Europe’s neighbourhood has deteriorated dramatically in recent years, and this has had significant consequences for the European Union (EU). Conflicts are multiplying in Eastern Europe and in the Mediterranean Sea; Russia and China are showing increasingly expansive tendencies in South Eastern Europe; and the USA is becoming less and less reliable as a security provider for Europe. Against this background, it is striking that the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) still falls far short of what would be expected from the EU given the size of its inter­nal market. The unanimity principle in the Council of the EU is often blamed for this. However, an analysis of CFSP data shows that the Member States are clearly satisfied with symbolic policy measures, despite their political rhetoric. This situation will not be resolved either by introducing simple majority voting or with mere declarations of political will from governments. The dialogue on the future of Europe should be seen as an opportunity to remedy the inability to act in the field of foreign policy by har­monising the CFSP 
650 7 |a Integration  |g Internationale Politik  |0 (DE-588)4161919-5  |0 (DE-603)085713031  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Entscheidungsprozess  |0 (DE-588)4121202-2  |0 (DE-603)085390763  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Internationale Organisation  |0 (DE-588)4027366-0  |0 (DE-603)085069779  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Internationale Politik  |0 (DE-588)4072885-7  |0 (DE-603)085205222  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Entscheidungsverfahren  |0 (DE-588)4637781-5  |0 (DE-603)098612433  |2 gnd 
700 1 |a Ålander, Minna  |e Verfasser  |4 aut  |0 (DE-603)458515299  |0 (DE-588)1204091196  |2 gnd 
700 1 |a Bochtler, Paul  |e Verfasser  |4 aut  |0 (DE-603)428868150  |0 (DE-588)1156924251  |2 gnd 
710 2 |a Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik  |e Herausgebendes Organ  |4 isb  |0 (DE-603)042767121  |0 (DE-588)2023076-X  |2 gnd 
775 0 8 |i Übersetzung von  |a Bendiek, Annegret, 1970 -   |t GASP: von der Ergebnis- zur Symbolpolitik  |d Berlin : SWP, 2020  |h 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023112314203833810743  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.18449/2020C58  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei 
856 |q application/pdf  |u https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C58_CFSPOutput.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)125125201X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252028  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252036  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252044  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252052  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252060  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252079  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252087  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252095  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252109  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252117  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252125  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252141  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252168  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252176  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1251252184  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d