The state of consensus in the EU
| Titel: | The state of consensus in the EU : what is the way forward in the debate about expanding qualified majority decisions? / Nicolai von Ondarza and Isabella Stürzer ; Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik - German Institute for International and Security Affairs |
|---|---|
| Verfasser: | ; |
| Körperschaft: | |
| Veröffentlicht: | Berlin : SWP, [April 2024] |
| Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) : Illustrationen |
| Format: | E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Schriftenreihe/ mehrbändiges Werk: |
SWP comment ; 2024, no. 16 (April 2024) |
| Einheitssachtitel: | Zum Stand der Konsensfähigkeit der EU |
| Andere Ausgaben: |
Übersetzung von: Ondarza, Nicolai von, 1982 -. Zum Stand der Konsensfähigkeit der EU. - Berlin : SWP, 2024. - 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten)
|
X
alg: 51816958 001A $06000:09-05-24 001B $01999:16-05-24 $t01:15:04.000 001D $06000:09-05-24 001U $0utf8 001X $00 002@ $0Oax 002C $aText $btxt $2rdacontent 002D $aComputermedien $bc $2rdamedia 002E $aOnline-Ressource $bcr $2rdacarrier 003@ $0518169588 004P $010.18449/2024C16 004U $0urn:nbn:de:101:1-2404262024412.657369367404 006G $01327688026 006U $024,O05 $f20240426 007A $01886276447 $aKXP 009Q $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $xR 009Q $uhttps://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2404262024412.657369367404 $xR 009Q $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $xR 009Q $qapplication/pdf $S0 $3Volltext $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $xH 010@ $aeng 010E $erda 011@ $a2024 $n[April 2024] 021A $aThe @state of consensus in the EU $dwhat is the way forward in the debate about expanding qualified majority decisions? $hNicolai von Ondarza and Isabella Stürzer ; Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik - German Institute for International and Security Affairs 022A $aZum Stand der Konsensfähigkeit der EU 028A $BVerfasser $4aut $7131662155 $8Ondarza, Nicolai$cvon$Z1982- [Tp1] $9178300632 028C $BVerfasser $4aut $8Stürzer, Isabella [Tp3] $949175969X 029F $BHerausgebendes Organ $#Фонд Науки и Политики $#SWP $#Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit $#Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit $#Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit der Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) $#German Institute for International and Security Affairs $#Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik - Forschungsinstitut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit $#Forschungsinstitut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit $#German Research Institute for International Affairs $4isb $72023076-X $8Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik [Tb1] $9042767121 033A $pBerlin $nSWP 034D $a1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) 034M $aIllustrationen 036E $aSWP comment $l2024, no. 16 (April 2024) 037A $a"English version of SWP-Aktuell 24/2024" 037A $aGesehen am 19.04.2024 039M $aÜbersetzung von $tZum Stand der Konsensfähigkeit der EU $dBerlin $eSWP $f2024 $h1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) $lOndarza, Nicolai von, 1982 - 045E $c320 046X $aArchivierung/Langzeitarchivierung gewährleistet $5DE-101 047I $aZusammenfassung: The debate in the European Union (EU) on the expansion of majority decision-making is entering a new round. Germany, in particular, is seeking to build a coalition in favour of more majority decisions in light of the, at times, difficult decision-making process concerning foreign and security policy, and the prospect of future EU enlargement. Too often, however, this debate is not taking into account how and with what results majority decisions are being used in other, sometimes equally contested policy areas. An analysis of the public votes since 2010 compiled in the SWP’s new EU Council Monitor shows that EU member states generally strive for consensus, even in majority decisions. Larger groups of member states are almost never outvoted. Still, Hungary and Poland increasingly stand out as two states that are outvoted more often than others, albeit to a slightly lesser degree than the United Kingdom (UK) was before Brexit. One way out of the dilemma between strengthening the EU’s ability to act and protecting vital national interests could be a well-balanced "sovereignty safety net" lok: 51816958 3 exp: 51816958 3 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.885 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876404 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 5 exp: 51816958 5 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.888 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876412 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 8 exp: 51816958 8 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.891 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876420 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 10 exp: 51816958 10 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.893 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876439 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 11 exp: 51816958 11 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.897 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876447 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 20 exp: 51816958 20 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.900 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876455 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 21 exp: 51816958 21 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.902 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876463 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 23 exp: 51816958 23 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.905 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876471 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 24 exp: 51816958 24 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.907 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $0126387648X 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 25 exp: 51816958 25 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.910 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876498 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 36 exp: 51816958 36 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.913 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876501 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 49 exp: 51816958 49 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.915 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $0126387651X 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 54 exp: 51816958 54 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.921 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876536 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 108 exp: 51816958 108 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.940 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876552 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 204 exp: 51816958 204 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.942 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876560 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH lok: 51816958 205 exp: 51816958 205 1 #EPN 201B/01 $016-05-24 $t01:15:04.947 201C/01 $015-05-24 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01263876579 208@/01 $a15-05-24 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 $XR 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf $XH
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 518169588 | ||
| 003 | DE-603 | ||
| 005 | 20240516011504.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 240509s2024 xx |||| o| u00||u|eng | ||
| 015 | |a 24,O05 |2 dnb | ||
| 016 | 7 | |2 DE-101 |a 1327688026 | |
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.18449/2024C16 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 7 | |a urn:nbn:de:101:1-2404262024412.657369367404 |2 urn | |
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1886276447 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-603 |b ger |c DE-603 |d DE-603 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 320 |q DE-101 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ondarza, Nicolai von |d 1982- |e Verfasser |4 aut |0 (DE-603)178300632 |0 (DE-588)131662155 |2 gnd | |
| 240 | 1 | 0 | |a Zum Stand der Konsensfähigkeit der EU |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a The state of consensus in the EU |b what is the way forward in the debate about expanding qualified majority decisions? |c Nicolai von Ondarza and Isabella Stürzer ; Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik - German Institute for International and Security Affairs |
| 264 | 1 | |a Berlin |b SWP |c [April 2024] | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) |b Illustrationen | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a SWP comment |v 2024, no. 16 (April 2024) | |
| 500 | |a "English version of SWP-Aktuell 24/2024" | ||
| 500 | |a Gesehen am 19.04.2024 | ||
| 520 | |a Zusammenfassung: The debate in the European Union (EU) on the expansion of majority decision-making is entering a new round. Germany, in particular, is seeking to build a coalition in favour of more majority decisions in light of the, at times, difficult decision-making process concerning foreign and security policy, and the prospect of future EU enlargement. Too often, however, this debate is not taking into account how and with what results majority decisions are being used in other, sometimes equally contested policy areas. An analysis of the public votes since 2010 compiled in the SWP’s new EU Council Monitor shows that EU member states generally strive for consensus, even in majority decisions. Larger groups of member states are almost never outvoted. Still, Hungary and Poland increasingly stand out as two states that are outvoted more often than others, albeit to a slightly lesser degree than the United Kingdom (UK) was before Brexit. One way out of the dilemma between strengthening the EU’s ability to act and protecting vital national interests could be a well-balanced "sovereignty safety net" | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Stürzer, Isabella |e Verfasser |4 aut |0 (DE-603)49175969X |0 (DE-588)125345521X |2 gnd | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik |e Herausgebendes Organ |4 isb |0 (DE-603)042767121 |0 (DE-588)2023076-X |2 gnd | |
| 775 | 0 | 8 | |i Übersetzung von |a Ondarza, Nicolai von, 1982 - |t Zum Stand der Konsensfähigkeit der EU |d Berlin : SWP, 2024 |h 1 Online-Ressource (8 Seiten) |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 |x Resolving-System | ||
| 856 | |u https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2404262024412.657369367404 |x Resolving-System | ||
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.18449/2024C16 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei | ||
| 856 | |q application/pdf |u https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2024C16_QualifiedMajorityDecisions.pdf |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext | ||
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876404 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876412 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876420 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876439 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876447 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876455 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876463 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876471 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)126387648X |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876498 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876501 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)126387651X |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876536 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876552 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876560 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1263876579 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
