The effects of participatory processes on public policy development in Kenya’s devolved governments
| Titel: | The effects of participatory processes on public policy development in Kenya’s devolved governments |
|---|---|
| Verfasser: | |
| Beteiligt: | |
| Körperschaft: |
|
| Veröffentlicht: | Freiburg : Universität, 2024 |
| Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource |
| Format: | E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Hochschulschrift: | Dissertation, Universität Freiburg, 2024 |
X
alg: 52524851 001A $06000:10-01-25 001B $01999:11-01-25 $t03:30:57.000 001D $06000:10-01-25 001U $0utf8 001X $00 002@ $0Oax 002C $aText $btxt $2rdacontent 002D $aComputermedien $bc $2rdamedia 002E $aOnline-Ressource $bcr $2rdacarrier 003@ $052524851X 004P $010.6094/UNIFR/260932 004U $0urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-freidok-2609325 006G $01351942255 006U $025,O01 $f20241223 007A $01351942255 $aDNB 009Q $uhttps://doi.org/10.6094/UNIFR/260932 $xR 009Q $uhttps://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-freidok-2609325 $xR 009Q $qapplication/pdf $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $xH 010@ $aeng 010E $erda 011@ $a2024 $n2024 013D $RWissenschaftliche Literatur $#Dissertations, Academic $#Thèses et écrits académiques $74113937-9 $8Hochschulschrift [Ts1] $9085338818 021A $aThe @effects of participatory processes on public policy development in Kenya’s devolved governments 028A $BVerfasser $#Kenyatta, Gloria $#Kenyatta, G. $4aut $D20241225 $Ecgwrk $71351601687 $8Kenyatta, Gloria Nyambura [Tp3] $9524852375 028C $BAkademischer Betreuer $4dgs $7122678621 $8Mehler, Andreas [Tp3] $9153789743 029F $BMitwirkender $#Bergstraesser-Institut $#ABI $#Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut für kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung e.V. $#Bergstraesser-Institut für Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung $#Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut $#Arnold Bergstraesser Institute for Socio-Political Research $#Arbeitsstelle für Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung Freiburg, Breisgau $#Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut für Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung Freiburg, Breisgau $#Arnold Bergstraesser Institute for Socio-Political Research Freiburg, Breisgau $#Bergstraesser Institute for Socio-Political Research Freiburg, Breisgau $#Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut Freiburg, Breisgau $#Bergstraesser-Institut für Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung Freiburg, Breisgau $#ABI Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut für Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung $#Bergstraesser-Institut Freiburg, Breisgau $#ABI Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut für Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung, Freiburg, Breisgau $#Bergstraesser Institute for Socio-Political Research $4ctb $71001165-1 $8Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut für Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung [Tb1] $9041874374 029F $BGrad-verleihende Institution $RAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg $RAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg $RAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg $RAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg $RAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg $RAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg $#Philosophische Fakultät Freiburg im Breisgau $4dgg $766230-6 $8Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg$bPhilosophische Fakultät [Tb1] $9040520366 033A $pFreiburg $nUniversität 034D $a1 Online-Ressource 037C $dDissertation $eUniversität Freiburg $f2024 037I $uhttp://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/access_rights/c_abf2 $fUnrestricted online access 037J $aOpen Access $2star $uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 $fUnrestricted online access 044K $qDNB $RBeteiligung $RMitwirkung $RPartizipation $RPolitische Beteiligung $#Citizen participation $#Participation des citoyens $#Bürgerbeteiligung $#Bürgerbeteiligung $#Bürger Mitbestimmung $#Bürger Mitwirkung $#Bürgermitentscheidung $#Bürgerpartizipation $#Mitbestimmung Bürger $emaschinell gebildet $74008767-0 $8Bürgerbeteiligung [Ts1] $9085015431 $k0,30134 044K $qDNB $REntwicklungshilfe $REntwicklungsmodell $#Economic assistance $#Aide économique $#development policies $#Entwicklungspolitik $#Entwicklungspolitik $#Entwicklungshilfepolitik $#Auslandshilfepolitik einzelner Staaten $#Entwicklungspolitik $#Entwicklungshilfepolitik $emaschinell gebildet $74014957-2 $8Entwicklungspolitik [Ts1] $9085033928 $k0,07860 044K $qDNB $RBeteiligung $RMitwirkung $#Participation $#Participation (philosophie) $#participation $#Partizipation $#Partizipation $#Soziale Partizipation $#Wirtschaftliche Partizipation $emaschinell gebildet $74044789-3 $8Partizipation [Ts1] $9085125830 $k0,07467 044K $qDNB $RBeteiligung $RPartizipation $RPolitische Willensbildung $RBürgerbeteiligung $RPolitische Betätigung $RPolitisches Handeln $#Political participation $#Participation politique $#Politische Partizipation $#politische Partizipation $#Politische Partizipation $#Politische Partizipation $#Politische Teilnahme $#Politische Teilhabe $emaschinell gebildet $74076215-4 $8Politische Beteiligung [Ts1] $9085216062 $k0,05204 044K $qDNB $RMitwirkung $RPartizipation $#Participation $#Participation (philosophie) $#Beteiligung $emaschinell gebildet $74006092-5 $8Beteiligung [Ts1] $9085008303 $k0,04961 044K $qDNB $RKenia $RKenya $#Kenia $#Kenia $#Ǧumhūrīyat Kīnyā $#Jamhuri ya Kenya $#Kenya $#Republic of Kenya $#Kīnyā $#Republik Kenia $#Chenia $#Government of Kenya $#GOK Government of Kenya $#Keniia $emaschinell gebildet $74030236-2 $8Kenia [Tg1] $908508011X $k0,69944 045E $c320 046X $aArchivierung/Langzeitarchivierung gewährleistet $5DE-101 047I $aAbstract: This dissertation examines the effects of the participatory processes on public policy development in Kenya’s devolved governments. Although public participation during policymaking in Kenya is a constitutional requirement, the procedures for its implementation are not prescribed by the law. Therefore, this dissertation focuses on participatory processes (informal) whose implementation procedures are not foreseen by the law, and their results are unbinding. The central objective is to explore the performance and effectiveness of these processes during public policy development, especially to establish if they are undertaken for superficial legitimacy or to enhance the policymaking process, as the Constitution of Kenya 2010 envisions. The research compares two devolved governments in Kenya, Nairobi City (urban) and Lamu (rural), to establish the commonalities and differences in the participatory processes during their execution. The research uses the “most different” design for its comparative analysis and the framework for Comparison of Participatory Processes (COPP) to assess the context, process, and outcome levels of these processes. The study employs qualitative data collection techniques supplemented with mixed surveys. The research reveals that the administrators in both counties have substantial leeway to determine the processes to use. They have opted for low-cost participatory processes due to the inadequate funds allocated to public participation. However, these processes are not the most effective and legitimacy-generating participatory mechanisms. Further, participatory processes are conducted by non-practitioners who are not well-prepared to undertake them effectively. Civic education is also not conducted in both counties to create awareness of these processes, their importance and to train the public on how to participate. The research further discloses that although both counties have established some institutional frameworks, they have not yet achieved a satisfactory level of institutionalization that can impact public participation. In addition, the research exposes that the execution of these processes does not adjust to most local contextual factors as the administrations focus more on one contextual element of financial resource capacities, overshadowing others that can promote quality participation if considered. While in the eyes of the majority of the study’s target groups, participatory processes have contributed to fulfilling some of their expectations in policymaking, the neglect of local contexts and the lack of political will by the policymakers to sustain these processes are significant setbacks that have contributed to their poor implementation, and thus unsatisfactory results. Furthermore, despite both counties being in different settings, they exhibit major similarities in executing participatory processes due to the usage of low-cost participatory processes, which are designed and implemented similarly. Therefore, based on the findings, considering appropriate process-level yardsticks linked to contextual factors is essential for quality participation and better policy outcomes. Overall, the study recommends three overarching perspectives that the local public administrations should rethink to address the unsustainability, power asymmetries, and ineffectiveness of these processes: political will (sustainability element), power redistribution (equality element), and location-specific contexts (quality element) lok: 52524851 3 exp: 52524851 3 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.797 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $0128901714X 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 5 exp: 52524851 5 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.800 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017158 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 8 exp: 52524851 8 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.804 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017166 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 10 exp: 52524851 10 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.806 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017174 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 11 exp: 52524851 11 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.809 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017182 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 20 exp: 52524851 20 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.812 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017190 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 21 exp: 52524851 21 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.814 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017204 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 23 exp: 52524851 23 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.817 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017212 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 24 exp: 52524851 24 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.819 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017220 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 25 exp: 52524851 25 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.822 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017239 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 36 exp: 52524851 36 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.824 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017247 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 49 exp: 52524851 49 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.827 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017255 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 54 exp: 52524851 54 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.832 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017271 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 108 exp: 52524851 108 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.837 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017298 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 204 exp: 52524851 204 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.839 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $01289017301 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH lok: 52524851 205 exp: 52524851 205 1 #EPN 201B/01 $011-01-25 $t03:30:57.842 201C/01 $011-01-25 201U/01 $0utf8 203@/01 $0128901731X 208@/01 $a11-01-25 $bl 209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 $XH
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 52524851X | ||
| 003 | DE-603 | ||
| 005 | 20250111033057.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 250110s2024 xx |||| om u00||u|eng | ||
| 015 | |a 25,O01 |2 dnb | ||
| 016 | 7 | |2 DE-101 |a 1351942255 | |
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.6094/UNIFR/260932 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 7 | |a urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-freidok-2609325 |2 urn | |
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DNB1351942255 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-603 |b ger |c DE-603 |d DE-603 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 320 |q DE-101 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kenyatta, Gloria Nyambura |e Verfasser |4 aut |0 (DE-603)524852375 |0 (DE-588)1351601687 |2 gnd | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a The effects of participatory processes on public policy development in Kenya’s devolved governments |
| 264 | 1 | |a Freiburg |b Universität |c 2024 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c Universität Freiburg |d 2024 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract: This dissertation examines the effects of the participatory processes on public policy development in Kenya’s devolved governments. Although public participation during policymaking in Kenya is a constitutional requirement, the procedures for its implementation are not prescribed by the law. Therefore, this dissertation focuses on participatory processes (informal) whose implementation procedures are not foreseen by the law, and their results are unbinding. The central objective is to explore the performance and effectiveness of these processes during public policy development, especially to establish if they are undertaken for superficial legitimacy or to enhance the policymaking process, as the Constitution of Kenya 2010 envisions. The research compares two devolved governments in Kenya, Nairobi City (urban) and Lamu (rural), to establish the commonalities and differences in the participatory processes during their execution. The research uses the “most different” design for its comparative analysis and the framework for Comparison of Participatory Processes (COPP) to assess the context, process, and outcome levels of these processes. The study employs qualitative data collection techniques supplemented with mixed surveys. The research reveals that the administrators in both counties have substantial leeway to determine the processes to use. They have opted for low-cost participatory processes due to the inadequate funds allocated to public participation. However, these processes are not the most effective and legitimacy-generating participatory mechanisms. Further, participatory processes are conducted by non-practitioners who are not well-prepared to undertake them effectively. Civic education is also not conducted in both counties to create awareness of these processes, their importance and to train the public on how to participate. The research further discloses that although both counties have established some institutional frameworks, they have not yet achieved a satisfactory level of institutionalization that can impact public participation. In addition, the research exposes that the execution of these processes does not adjust to most local contextual factors as the administrations focus more on one contextual element of financial resource capacities, overshadowing others that can promote quality participation if considered. While in the eyes of the majority of the study’s target groups, participatory processes have contributed to fulfilling some of their expectations in policymaking, the neglect of local contexts and the lack of political will by the policymakers to sustain these processes are significant setbacks that have contributed to their poor implementation, and thus unsatisfactory results. Furthermore, despite both counties being in different settings, they exhibit major similarities in executing participatory processes due to the usage of low-cost participatory processes, which are designed and implemented similarly. Therefore, based on the findings, considering appropriate process-level yardsticks linked to contextual factors is essential for quality participation and better policy outcomes. Overall, the study recommends three overarching perspectives that the local public administrations should rethink to address the unsustainability, power asymmetries, and ineffectiveness of these processes: political will (sustainability element), power redistribution (equality element), and location-specific contexts (quality element) | ||
| 650 | 7 | |8 1\p |a Bürgerbeteiligung |0 (DE-588)4008767-0 |0 (DE-603)085015431 |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |8 2\p |a Entwicklungspolitik |0 (DE-588)4014957-2 |0 (DE-603)085033928 |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |8 3\p |a Partizipation |0 (DE-588)4044789-3 |0 (DE-603)085125830 |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |8 4\p |a Politische Beteiligung |0 (DE-588)4076215-4 |0 (DE-603)085216062 |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |8 5\p |a Beteiligung |0 (DE-588)4006092-5 |0 (DE-603)085008303 |2 gnd | |
| 651 | 7 | |8 6\p |a Kenia |0 (DE-588)4030236-2 |0 (DE-603)08508011X |2 gnd | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |0 (DE-603)085338818 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mehler, Andreas |e Akademischer Betreuer |4 dgs |0 (DE-603)153789743 |0 (DE-588)122678621 |2 gnd | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut für Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung |e Mitwirkender |4 ctb |0 (DE-603)041874374 |0 (DE-588)1001165-1 |2 gnd | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg |b Philosophische Fakultät |e Grad-verleihende Institution |4 dgg |0 (DE-603)040520366 |0 (DE-588)66230-6 |2 gnd | |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.6094/UNIFR/260932 |x Resolving-System | ||
| 856 | |u https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-freidok-2609325 |x Resolving-System | ||
| 856 | |q application/pdf |u https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/260932 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei | ||
| 883 | 0 | |8 1\p |a maschinell gebildet |c 0,30134 |q DE-101 | |
| 883 | 0 | |8 2\p |a maschinell gebildet |c 0,07860 |q DE-101 | |
| 883 | 0 | |8 3\p |a maschinell gebildet |c 0,07467 |q DE-101 | |
| 883 | 0 | |8 4\p |a maschinell gebildet |c 0,05204 |q DE-101 | |
| 883 | 0 | |8 5\p |a maschinell gebildet |c 0,04961 |q DE-101 | |
| 883 | 0 | |8 6\p |a maschinell gebildet |c 0,69944 |q DE-101 | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)128901714X |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017158 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017166 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017174 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017182 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017190 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017204 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017212 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017220 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017239 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017247 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017255 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017271 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017298 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)1289017301 |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
| 924 | 1 | |9 603 |a (DE-603)128901731X |b DE-603 |c HES |d d | |
