Counterpreservation

Titel: Counterpreservation : Architectural Decay in Berlin since 1989
Beteiligt:
Veröffentlicht: Ithaca : Cornell University Press ; Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library [Imprint], 2016
Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (274 p.)
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
Schriftenreihe/
mehrbändiges Werk:
Signale: Modern German Letters, Cultures, and Thought
RVK-Notation:
Schlagworte:
ISBN: 9781501703164 ; 9781501703171 ; 9781501706271 ; 9781501706806
alg: 53095718
001A    $06055:26-06-25 
001B    $01999:28-06-25 $t21:54:02.000 
001D    $06055:26-06-25 
001U    $0utf8 
001X    $00 
002@    $0Oax 
002C    $aText $btxt $2rdacontent 
002D    $aComputermedien $bc $2rdamedia 
002E    $aOnline-Ressource $bcr $2rdacarrier 
003@    $0530957183 
004A    $A978-1-5017-0316-4 
004A    $A978-1-5017-0317-1 
004A    $A978-1-5017-0627-1 
004A    $A978-1-5017-0680-6 
004R    $020.500.12657/62125 
007I    $0oapen-20.500.12657/62125 
009Q    $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $xR 
010@    $aeng 
011@    $a2016 
017B    $aZDB-94-OAL 
021A    $aCounterpreservation $dArchitectural Decay in Berlin since 1989 
028C    $aSandler $BHerausgeber $dDaniela $4edt 
033A    $pIthaca $nCornell University Press ; Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library [Imprint] 
033E    $pThe Hague $nOapen Foundation 
034D    $a1 Online-Ressource (274 p.) 
036G    $aSignale: Modern German Letters, Cultures, and Thought 
037J    $aOpen Access $2star $uhttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 $fUnrestricted online access 
044K    $RStadtplanung $RSchwellenanalyse $#Cities and towns Growth $#Croissance urbaine $#Stadtentwicklung $#Stadtentwicklung $#Stadtentwicklung $#Stadt Entwicklung $74056730-8 $8Stadtentwicklung [Ts1] $908515797X 
044K    $RArchitekt $RBaudenkmal $RBauweise $RInnenarchitektur $#Architecture $#Architecture $#Baukunst $74002851-3 $8Architektur [Ts1] $9084999292 
044K    $RGemeindesoziologie $RStadtforschung $#Sociology, Urban $#Sociologie urbaine $#Sociologia urbana $#Sociología urbana $#Stadtsoziologie $#Stadtsoziologie $#Stadt Soziologie $74077811-3 $8Stadtsoziologie [Ts1] $9085220515 
044K    $RBerlin $RBerlin $RBerlin $RBerlin $RBerlin $RBerlin $#Berlin $#Berlin $#柏林 $#Großberlin $#Groß-Berlin $#Haupt- und Residenz-Stadt Berlin $#Reichshauptstadt Berlin $#Berlino $#Berolino $#Stadtgemeinde Berlin $#Hauptstadt Berlin $#Birlīn $#Barlīn $#Berolinon $#Land Berlin $#Coloniae Brandenburgicae $#Berlinum $#Verolino $#Berolinum $#Cölln an der Spree $#Colonia Brandenburgica $#Colonia Marchica $#Cöln an der Spree $#"Besonderes Gebiet" Berlin $#Gross-Berlin $74005728-8 $8Berlin [Tgz] $9085007188 
045B    $a720.9431550904 $eDDC23eng 
045E    $c300 $c720 
045R    $aGeschichte 1989-2010 
045Z    $8LK 16678 [Tkv] $940994422X 
045Z    $8LH 60320 [Tkv] $9409890111 
045Z    $8LH 67724 [Tkv] $9409897035 
047A    $aSacherschließung maschinell aus paralleler Ausg. übernommen 
047I    $aIn Berlin, decrepit structures do not always denote urban blight. Decayed buildings are incorporated into everyday life as residences, exhibition spaces, shops, offices, and as leisure space. As nodes of public dialogue, they serve as platforms for dissenting views about the future and past of Berlin. In this book, Daniela Sandler introduces the concept of counterpreservation as a way to understand this intentional appropriation of decrepitude. The embrace of decay is a sign of Berlin's iconoclastic rebelliousness, but it has also been incorporated into the mainstream economy of tourism and development as part of the city's countercultural cachet. Sandler presents the possibilities and shortcomings of counterpreservation as a dynamic force in Berlin and as a potential concept for other cities. Counterpreservation is part of Berlin's fabric: in the city's famed Hausprojekte (living projects) such as the Køpi, Tuntenhaus, and KA 86; in cultural centers such as the Haus Schwarzenberg, the Schokoladen, and the legendary, now defunct Tacheles; in memorials and museums; and even in commerce and residences. The appropriation of ruins is a way of carving out affordable spaces for housing, work, and cultural activities. It is also a visual statement against gentrification, and a complex representation of history, with the marks of different periods-the nineteenth century, World War II, postwar division, unification-on display for all to see. Counterpreservation exemplifies an everyday urbanism in which citizens shape private and public spaces with their own hands, but it also influences more formal designs, such as the Topography of Terror, the Berlin Wall Memorial, and Daniel Libeskind's unbuilt redevelopment proposal for a site peppered with ruins of Nazi barracks. By featuring these examples, Sandler questions conventional notions of architectural authorship and points toward the value of participatory environments. 

lok: 53095718 3

exp: 53095718 3 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.899 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902476 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 5

exp: 53095718 5 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.904 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902484 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 8

exp: 53095718 8 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.906 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902492 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 10

exp: 53095718 10 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.909 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902506 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 11

exp: 53095718 11 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.912 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902514 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 20

exp: 53095718 20 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.915 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902522 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 21

exp: 53095718 21 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.917 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902530 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 23

exp: 53095718 23 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.920 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902549 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 24

exp: 53095718 24 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.922 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902557 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 25

exp: 53095718 25 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.925 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902565 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 36

exp: 53095718 36 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.927 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902573 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 49

exp: 53095718 49 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.930 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902581 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 54

exp: 53095718 54 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.933 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0130890259X 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 69

exp: 53095718 69 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.935 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902603 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 75

exp: 53095718 75 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.938 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902611 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 76

exp: 53095718 76 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.941 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $0130890262X 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 107

exp: 53095718 107 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.944 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902638 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 108

exp: 53095718 108 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.947 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902646 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 204

exp: 53095718 204 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.950 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902654 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR 

lok: 53095718 205

exp: 53095718 205 1 #EPN
201B/01 $028-06-25 $t21:54:02.953 
201C/01 $028-06-25 
201U/01 $0utf8 
203@/01 $01308902662 
208@/01 $a28-06-25 $bl 
209S/01 $S0 $uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125 $XR
LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 530957183
003 DE-603
005 20250628215402.0
007 cr||||||||||||
008 250626s2016 xx |||| o| u00||u|eng c
020 |a 9781501703164 
020 |a 9781501703171 
020 |a 9781501706271 
020 |a 9781501706806 
024 7 |a 20.500.12657/62125  |2 hdl 
035 |a (DE-599)HEB530957183 
040 |a DE-603  |b ger  |c DE-603  |d DE-603 
041 |a eng 
082 7 |a 720.9431550904  |2 23/eng 
084 |a 300  |a 720  |q DE-101  |2 sdnb 
084 |a LK 16678  |0 (DE-625)97619:13309  |0 (DE-603)40994422X  |2 rvk 
084 |a LH 60320  |0 (DE-625)94189:  |0 (DE-603)409890111  |2 rvk 
084 |a LH 67724  |0 (DE-625)94673:  |0 (DE-603)409897035  |2 rvk 
245 0 0 |a Counterpreservation  |b Architectural Decay in Berlin since 1989 
264 1 |a Ithaca  |b Cornell University Press ; Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library [Imprint]  |c 2016 
264 2 |a The Hague  |b Oapen Foundation 
300 |a 1 Online-Ressource (274 p.) 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Signale: Modern German Letters, Cultures, and Thought 
520 |a In Berlin, decrepit structures do not always denote urban blight. Decayed buildings are incorporated into everyday life as residences, exhibition spaces, shops, offices, and as leisure space. As nodes of public dialogue, they serve as platforms for dissenting views about the future and past of Berlin. In this book, Daniela Sandler introduces the concept of counterpreservation as a way to understand this intentional appropriation of decrepitude. The embrace of decay is a sign of Berlin's iconoclastic rebelliousness, but it has also been incorporated into the mainstream economy of tourism and development as part of the city's countercultural cachet. Sandler presents the possibilities and shortcomings of counterpreservation as a dynamic force in Berlin and as a potential concept for other cities. Counterpreservation is part of Berlin's fabric: in the city's famed Hausprojekte (living projects) such as the Køpi, Tuntenhaus, and KA 86; in cultural centers such as the Haus Schwarzenberg, the Schokoladen, and the legendary, now defunct Tacheles; in memorials and museums; and even in commerce and residences. The appropriation of ruins is a way of carving out affordable spaces for housing, work, and cultural activities. It is also a visual statement against gentrification, and a complex representation of history, with the marks of different periods-the nineteenth century, World War II, postwar division, unification-on display for all to see. Counterpreservation exemplifies an everyday urbanism in which citizens shape private and public spaces with their own hands, but it also influences more formal designs, such as the Topography of Terror, the Berlin Wall Memorial, and Daniel Libeskind's unbuilt redevelopment proposal for a site peppered with ruins of Nazi barracks. By featuring these examples, Sandler questions conventional notions of architectural authorship and points toward the value of participatory environments. 
648 7 |a Geschichte 1989-2010  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Stadtentwicklung  |0 (DE-588)4056730-8  |0 (DE-603)08515797X  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Architektur  |0 (DE-588)4002851-3  |0 (DE-603)084999292  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Stadtsoziologie  |0 (DE-588)4077811-3  |0 (DE-603)085220515  |2 gnd 
651 7 |a Berlin  |0 (DE-588)4005728-8  |0 (DE-603)085007188  |2 gnd 
700 1 |a Sandler, Daniela  |e Herausgeber  |4 edt 
856 |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62125  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei 
912 |a ZDB-94-OAL 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902476  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902484  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902492  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902506  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902514  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902522  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902530  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902549  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902557  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902565  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902573  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902581  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)130890259X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902603  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902611  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)130890262X  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902638  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902646  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902654  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d 
924 1 |9 603  |a (DE-603)1308902662  |b DE-603  |c HES  |d d